Utility Code 110500
The Utility Detail View displays the Utility Information (identified by Utility Code - 110500), authorities, and case information associated with that utility.
Basic Utility Information
Utility Name
PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORP
Utility Code
110500
Utility Type
Electric
Utility Status
Active
Carrier ID
Utility Contact Information
Physical Address
Mailing Address
TWO NORTH NINTH STREET
ALLENTOWN PA 18101
Phone
610-774-5696
Fax
610-774-4102
Website
www.pplweb.com
Email
KKLOCK@PPLWEB.COM
Utility Authorities Information
| Service Type | Authority Status | Date Certified | Suspension Date | Suspension Expiration | Application Number | Trading As Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Distributor | Active | A-110500 | PPL UTILITIES (PPL) |
Utility Insurance Information
No insurance information for this utility.
EGS Territories Serviced by a Utility
Residential
No
Citizens’ Electric
No
Small Commercial
Duquesne Light
No
Mixed Meter
Met-Ed
No
Large Commercial
No
PECO
No
Industrial
No
Penelec
No
Governmental
No
Penn Power
No
Pike
No
PPL
No
UGI Utilities - Electric
No
Wellsboro
No
West Penn Power
No
Docketed Cases
| Docket Number | Case Status | Date Filed | Allegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-2011-2271928 | Closed | 10/28/2011 | Complaintant states that former tenant Amanda Lurkin and her boyfriend told him that they switched power into their name. Complaintant states that through a collection agency they accepted the electric bill of approximately $220. Complaintan tstates that the problem was with Amanda Lurkin's check. Complaintant wants the billing to reflect tha the does not owe anything, and that Amanda Lurkin, who wrote the check shuold be pursued to pay the amount. Complaintant states that he has never included any utilities as part of the rent. |
| F-2011-2278507 | Closed | 12/2/2011 | Complaintant states that he caanot pay such a high bill, because he has lost his job. Complaintant states he tried another electric company and the bills were even higher. Complaintant states that when his father passed away that his father's bill was added onto his bill. Complaintant wants to pay a reasonable payment agreement based on his budget plus $100 for the balance paid. |
| F-2011-2272350 | Closed | 11/3/2011 | Complaintant states that he called to set up a paymentplan and could not afford it. Complaintant just wants a payment agreement that he can afford. |
| C-2012-2303227 | Closed | 5/4/2012 | Complaintant states that he would like a payment agreement. |
| F-2015-2474654 | Closed | 3/27/2015 | Complaintant states that he would like certain online payments not credited to his account refunded. |
| F-2011-2255814 | Closed | 8/4/2011 | Complaintant states that he would like to resolve isue by paying month's charges plus a additional $50. Complainant states that he cannot afford first proposed amount of current bill plus $350 per month. |
| C-2011-2273529 | Closed | 11/15/2011 | Complaintant states that her street has lost power on three seperate occasions, all lasting atleast 48 hours. Complaintant does not know why her neighbors across the street are not losing power, and her side of the street is losing power. Complaintant wants the problem found and fixed. |
| C-2011-2268207 | Closed | 10/14/2011 | Complaintant states that his ex-wife put the bill in his name. Complaintant moved out and has all utilities included in the rent, until moving to his present address. Complaintant does not believe that he should be responsible for a bill that was put in his name, by a ex-wife that he has not been with for over three years. Complaintant would like bill removed from his account. Complaintant just wants billed for current address. |
| F-00281874 | Closed | 3/14/1996 | COMPLAINTANT STATES THAT MONTHLY BILLS ARE EXCESSIVE DUE TO FAULTY METER. COMPLAINTANT REQUEST THAT METER AND/OR LINE BE CHECKED AND RECONSIDERATION BE GIVEN TO MONTHLY BILLS..................................................... |
| F-2011-2279150 | Closed | 12/5/2011 | Complaintant states that payment arrangements are too high, and that they believe they are being over charged. Complaintant wants a more reasonable payment arrangement. |
| C-2011-2266027 | Closed | 9/26/2011 | Complaintant states that PPL is using the incorrect rate schedule. Complaintant states that instead of being biled for Residential Rate, he was being billed General Service Rate for twenty years. Complaintnat states that PPL checked and confirmed Residential status, but only gave credit for up to four years at $960.66. Complaintnant understands that the PUC only requires companies to go back four years, but wants the full twenty years accounted, due to PPL making the mistake. |
| C-2011-2262527 | Closed | 9/7/2011 | Complaintant states that PPL sent on August 29, 2011 a 10 day shut off notice for a non payment of $747.29. Complaintant states that in July 2010 their meter supposedly shut off. Complaintant states that they are not responsible for the broken or faulty PPL meter. Complaintant states that they would like to know how the bill was computed without any actual readings from a workable meter. Complaintant states that they should be allowed to pay on a payment schedule and not have to pay as much as the $747.29. |
| C-20027623 | Closed | 5/13/2002 | COMPLAINTANT STATES THAT SHE CAN PAY HER BUDGETED AMOUNT OF $95 A MONTH START -ING IN JUNE BUT CANNOT PAY $342 UP FRONT. |
| C-2011-2250581 | Closed | 6/22/2011 | Complaintant States that she cannot pay her bill until she is released from her payment plan with PUC. |
| F-2011-2258658 | Closed | 8/22/2011 | Complaintant states that she was told PPL has her on a budget plan, and she only agreed to $60 a month. Complaintant states that she is confused on why he rbills are so high. Complaintant states that she was confused on all the bills going out, and the high rates. Complaintant wants to know if all charges are hers, as wellas a payment plan of $60 a month that was agreed upon. |
| F-2011-2270799 | Closed | 10/21/2011 | Complaintant states that she would like a payment agreement and a reduction of amount owed. Also states that she has a termination notice. |
| F-2011-2263597 | Closed | 9/13/2011 | Complaintant states that she would like a payment agreement. |
| F-2011-2267428 | Closed | 10/5/2011 | Complaintant states that the amount being told to pay by PUC is to much money. Complaintant wants a lower monthly payment agreement that is affordable. |
| C-2011-2278017 | Closed | 11/29/2011 | Complaintant states that the amount of $104 a month is too high for her to afford right now. Complaintant states that with other bills and less than 40 hours a week of employment for her boyfriend, it is hard to keep the agreement. Complaintant would like a lower payment agreement. |
| F-2011-2280909 | Closed | 12/22/2011 | Complaintant states that the amount of $133 a month and regular usage cost per month is more than they can afford. Complaintant would like to pay only $20-25 more than usual usage amount per month. |
| F-2011-2280908 | Closed | 12/21/2011 | Complaintant states that the bill is at a commercial rate. Complaintant states hat more people occupied the address than expected, and claimed to be seperat etenants sharing the same meter. Complaintant wants to know why service was continued as long as they occupied the place. Complaintan wants to know why only after individuals were evicted, did collection proceedings begin on the property. Complaintant states tha tservice should have been terminated sooner, and that the bill is not entirely their fault. Complaintnat would like a affordable payment agreement. |
| F-2011-2266735 | Closed | 10/3/2011 | Complaintant states that the budget plan set up by the PUC is more money than they can afford to pay each month. Complaintant states that they would like to have PPL set up a paymeny plan where they will pay their budget amount plus addtional $100 unti lbalance is paid in full. |
| C-2011-2276343 | Closed | 11/14/2011 | Complaintant states that the buget plan is to high for her income. Complaintant states that they would like to have a lower amount to pay each month on their budget plan due to getting only $576.00 a month with unemployment. |
| C-2011-2279365 | Closed | 12/7/2011 | Complaintant states that the power was turned off because of a non-payment, and they went to a hotel for two nights. Complaintant states that when they returned home the power was back on. Complaintant states that two weeks later the power was turned back off, and the y stayed a hote lfor anothe two nights. Complaintant states that they ended up receiving a $920 tampering fee. Complaintant states that they never tampered with their meter. Complaintant wants all the tampering fees to be waived from their account. |
| C-2011-2268983 | Closed | 10/18/2011 | Complaintant states that the rate increase of proposed tariff may be unjust, unreasonable, unduly, discriminatory and otherwise contrary to law, particularly small business customers. Complaintant states PPL Electric's proposed rates and rate design could be unjust, unreasonable, and unlawfully discriminatory in violation of inter alia, Section 1301 and 1304 of PUC code 66 PA C.S. Complaintant wants the PUC to suspend and investigate the Tariff Electric -PA PUC No 201 Supplement 110, at end of investigation reject proposed ne wrates and other tariff changes i nTariff Electric No 201 Supplement 110, and gran tother relief considered appropriate. |
Showing results 9351 - 9375 of 11733
Need More Help?
If you can't find what you're looking for here, please contact the PA Public Utility Commission. Call us at 1-800-692-7380 or contact us online.
Document Search
Public utility documents available electronically include case dockets, public meeting orders and more.
Filing & Resources
Find utility-related reports, laws and regulations, federal filings, tariffs, procedures and more.
eFILING
Consumers, utilities and attorneys can save time by submitting documents to the PUC electronically.
