Utility Code 110500
The Utility Detail View displays the Utility Information (identified by Utility Code - 110500), authorities, and case information associated with that utility.
Basic Utility Information
Utility Name
PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORP
Utility Code
110500
Utility Type
Electric
Utility Status
Active
Carrier ID
Utility Contact Information
Physical Address
Mailing Address
TWO NORTH NINTH STREET
ALLENTOWN PA 18101
Phone
610-774-5696
Fax
610-774-4102
Website
www.pplweb.com
Email
KKLOCK@PPLWEB.COM
Utility Authorities Information
| Service Type | Authority Status | Date Certified | Suspension Date | Suspension Expiration | Application Number | Trading As Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Distributor | Active | A-110500 | PPL UTILITIES (PPL) |
Utility Insurance Information
No insurance information for this utility.
EGS Territories Serviced by a Utility
Residential
No
Citizens’ Electric
No
Small Commercial
Duquesne Light
No
Mixed Meter
Met-Ed
No
Large Commercial
No
PECO
No
Industrial
No
Penelec
No
Governmental
No
Penn Power
No
Pike
No
PPL
No
UGI Utilities - Electric
No
Wellsboro
No
West Penn Power
No
Docketed Cases
| Docket Number | Case Status | Date Filed | Allegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-2011-2267428 | Closed | 10/5/2011 | Complaintant states that the amount being told to pay by PUC is to much money. Complaintant wants a lower monthly payment agreement that is affordable. |
| C-2011-2278017 | Closed | 11/29/2011 | Complaintant states that the amount of $104 a month is too high for her to afford right now. Complaintant states that with other bills and less than 40 hours a week of employment for her boyfriend, it is hard to keep the agreement. Complaintant would like a lower payment agreement. |
| F-2011-2280909 | Closed | 12/22/2011 | Complaintant states that the amount of $133 a month and regular usage cost per month is more than they can afford. Complaintant would like to pay only $20-25 more than usual usage amount per month. |
| F-2011-2280908 | Closed | 12/21/2011 | Complaintant states that the bill is at a commercial rate. Complaintant states hat more people occupied the address than expected, and claimed to be seperat etenants sharing the same meter. Complaintant wants to know why service was continued as long as they occupied the place. Complaintan wants to know why only after individuals were evicted, did collection proceedings begin on the property. Complaintant states tha tservice should have been terminated sooner, and that the bill is not entirely their fault. Complaintnat would like a affordable payment agreement. |
| F-2011-2266735 | Closed | 10/3/2011 | Complaintant states that the budget plan set up by the PUC is more money than they can afford to pay each month. Complaintant states that they would like to have PPL set up a paymeny plan where they will pay their budget amount plus addtional $100 unti lbalance is paid in full. |
| C-2011-2276343 | Closed | 11/14/2011 | Complaintant states that the buget plan is to high for her income. Complaintant states that they would like to have a lower amount to pay each month on their budget plan due to getting only $576.00 a month with unemployment. |
| C-2011-2279365 | Closed | 12/7/2011 | Complaintant states that the power was turned off because of a non-payment, and they went to a hotel for two nights. Complaintant states that when they returned home the power was back on. Complaintant states that two weeks later the power was turned back off, and the y stayed a hote lfor anothe two nights. Complaintant states that they ended up receiving a $920 tampering fee. Complaintant states that they never tampered with their meter. Complaintant wants all the tampering fees to be waived from their account. |
| C-2011-2268983 | Closed | 10/18/2011 | Complaintant states that the rate increase of proposed tariff may be unjust, unreasonable, unduly, discriminatory and otherwise contrary to law, particularly small business customers. Complaintant states PPL Electric's proposed rates and rate design could be unjust, unreasonable, and unlawfully discriminatory in violation of inter alia, Section 1301 and 1304 of PUC code 66 PA C.S. Complaintant wants the PUC to suspend and investigate the Tariff Electric -PA PUC No 201 Supplement 110, at end of investigation reject proposed ne wrates and other tariff changes i nTariff Electric No 201 Supplement 110, and gran tother relief considered appropriate. |
| C-2011-2279460 | Closed | 12/7/2011 | Complaintant states that their electric bill is more than they can afford. Complaintant would like a lower monthly payment, and to be able to enroll in ontrack program. |
| C-2011-2277347 | Closed | 11/28/2011 | Complaintant states that their monthly budget is too high. Complaintant states that they get late charges added that cause even larger debt. Complaintant would like a monthly budget around $100-$125 monthly. |
| C-2011-2278412 | Closed | 12/14/2011 | Complaintant states that their street loses power an average of three times a year. Complaintant states outages last between three to five days. Complaintant states that it usually only takes a few minutes to fix when PPL shows up with technicians. Complaintant states that neighbor across the street never loses power. Complaintant wants equipment replaced, trees near the lines better maintained, investigate why one side of the street loses power and the other side does not, and if necessary bury power lines. |
| C-2011-2266482 | Closed | 9/30/2011 | Complaintant states that their upset wit hthe poor communication and responses received from PPL after Hurricane Irene.Complaintnat states that PPL was contacted August 27th when power went down,and during the next few days trying to get help with a low hanging wire and the power outage. Complaintant states that on August 31 a crew shows up and ties the wire with a rope and another crew was suppose to finish the job, bu tnever shows up to get the job done.Complaintant states that for five night and six days power was down for a job taking less than one hour to finish. Complaintant would like the PUC t oinvestigate PPL storm and emergency procedures, did PPL act professionally in restoring power to customers, did PPL wor karound the clock to fix problems, Is PPL understaffed, and How can PPL communicate better to each other and customers. |
| F-2011-2265898 | Closed | 9/23/2011 | Complaintant states that they are beiing told different opinons on the budget program. Complaintant states that she was told that they can be removed from the budget program, and they were told they cannot be removed from the budget program. Complaintant states thatthey believe it would be cheaper not to be on the budget program, because they cannot afford the $300 each month. Complaintant wants to know if there are any programs that can get the bill paid, other than the proposed amount. |
| F-2011-2260412 | Closed | 8/31/2011 | Complaintant states that they are having difficulty with the high amount PPL wants for the bill. Complaintant states that the bills seem to increase each time the bill is paid instead of decreasing in amount owed. Complaintant would like the account re-evaluated and having a more affordable payment for the bill. |
| C-2011-2277354 | Closed | 11/28/2011 | Complaintant states that they are trying to get a payment agreement due to finances being cut drastically. Complaintant states that they have applied for LHEAP Assistance. Complaintant would like the PUC to lower the Payment Agreement. |
| F-2011-2261500 | Closed | 9/6/2011 | Complaintant states that they cannot afford the $385 per month payment.Complaintant states that they never had electric shut off and always pays the bill. Complaintant states that they would like a more resonable payment plan. |
| F-2011-2266036 | Closed | 9/27/2011 | Complaintant states that they cannot afford the high monthly payments for the bill. Complaintnat would like to have areasonable monthly payment plan according to their income and other monthly expenses. |
| C-2011-2276684 | Closed | 11/21/2011 | Complaintant states that they cannot afford the monthly payments. Complaintan states that the monthly income along with three minor children, does not allow enough money to cover the utility bills at the present time. Complaintant states that they do no towe money, but would like a reasonable monthly payment arrangment to be ordered by the PUC for PPL to give the complaintant. |
| C-2011-2279570 | Closed | 12/20/2011 | Complaintant states that they cannot afford their payment arrangement. Complaintant wants a lower payment arrangement. |
| F-2011-2279142 | Closed | 12/5/2011 | Complaintant states that they cannot afford to pay the amount on their bill each month, and afford medicine they need to live. Complaintant wants the $260 budget lowered and the removal of the $32.00 extra being told to pay each month. |
| C-2011-2266920 | Closed | 10/12/2011 | Complaintant states that they cannot pay the amount due by October 13, 2011. Complaintant states that they could not file an informal complaint, so they have filed a formal complaint. Complaintant would like to have a payment plan set up with budget plus $100 as a example of a affordable plan. |
| C-2011-2279176 | Closed | 11/29/2011 | Complaintant states that they do not agree with the Final Calculation of the General Supply Charge-1 for the Applicatoin Period December 1, 2011 through February 29, 2012, filed by PPL Electric Utilities Corporation. Complaintant states that PPL Electric's present and proposed rates, rules, and condtions of service may be unjust, unreasonable, unduly discriminatory, and contrary to law. Complainant states that Small Businesses especially are being hit hard with the rate increase. Complaintant wants the investigation of the GSC-1 and reject the proposed GSC-1 to the extent required to insure PPL Electric's rates are lawful, just, reasonable, and not discriminatory. Complaintan twants other releif that may be thought necessary or appropriate. |
| F-2011-2277007 | Closed | 11/28/2011 | Complaintant states that they do not use the amount of electricity as the company says they do. Complaintant states that they only used one AC during the summer, and turned it off two weeks after summer ended. Complaintant would like to see if neighbors are using her electricty. Complaintant would also like a payment arrangement. |
| C-2011-2266042 | Closed | 9/28/2011 | Complaintant states that they had a bill of $700, and paid back $500. Complaintant states that the bill was then $188, and they paid $86.85 dropping the bill with this month's charge to $163.85. Complaintant states that they were put on a plan, but the plan is too high. Complaintant would like to be removed from the plan, so that they can pay their normal bill. |
| F-2011-2260219 | Closed | 8/30/2011 | Complaintant states that they had a bill that was high for July and August, when they did not increase usage. Complaintant states they tried to apply for ontrack and was denied. Complaintant has included proof to show the significant jump in their bill. Complaintant would like the two high bills fixed. Complaintant also states that they have the same meter that was there for over 9 years, so the meter may not be accurate. |
Showing results 9451 - 9475 of 11830
Need More Help?
If you can't find what you're looking for here, please contact the PA Public Utility Commission. Call us at 1-800-692-7380 or contact us online.
Document Search
Public utility documents available electronically include case dockets, public meeting orders and more.
Filing & Resources
Find utility-related reports, laws and regulations, federal filings, tariffs, procedures and more.
eFILING
Consumers, utilities and attorneys can save time by submitting documents to the PUC electronically.
