Utility Code 110500
The Utility Detail View displays the Utility Information (identified by Utility Code - 110500), authorities, and case information associated with that utility.
Basic Utility Information
Utility Name
PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORP
Utility Code
110500
Utility Type
Electric
Utility Status
Active
Carrier ID
Utility Contact Information
Physical Address
Mailing Address
TWO NORTH NINTH STREET
ALLENTOWN PA 18101
Phone
610-774-5696
Fax
610-774-4102
Website
www.pplweb.com
Email
KKLOCK@PPLWEB.COM
Utility Authorities Information
| Service Type | Authority Status | Date Certified | Suspension Date | Suspension Expiration | Application Number | Trading As Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Distributor | Active | A-110500 | PPL UTILITIES (PPL) |
Utility Insurance Information
No insurance information for this utility.
EGS Territories Serviced by a Utility
Residential
No
Citizens’ Electric
No
Small Commercial
Duquesne Light
No
Mixed Meter
Met-Ed
No
Large Commercial
No
PECO
No
Industrial
No
Penelec
No
Governmental
No
Penn Power
No
Pike
No
PPL
No
UGI Utilities - Electric
No
Wellsboro
No
West Penn Power
No
Docketed Cases
| Docket Number | Case Status | Date Filed | Allegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-2011-2273312 | Closed | 11/14/2011 | Complaintant states that they had charges added to their account from a address they were not a resident at since July 2007. Complaintant states that they moved two years ago, and that PPL added additional charges on her account. Complaintant wants to know if she qualifies for LIHEAP, how can she pay $200 plus on top of her regular bill. Complaintant would like to be on a reasonable budget that is affordable to her. Complaintant would also like charges to he raccount after July 2007 to be removed. |
| F-2012-2281339 | Closed | 12/27/2011 | Complaintant states that they have a payment agreement that they cannot afford with PPL. Complaintan states that they are waitin gfor OnTrack program to respond to their request of being enrolled in the program. Complaintan tstates that they would like to be on OnTrack or other suitable program, or atleast be allowed to have original budget plan of $180 a month. |
| F-2011-2268660 | Closed | 10/17/2011 | Complaintant states that they have lived at residence for seven years and finally go ttheir meter tested for the first time by PPL, which found the meter to be malfunctioning. Complaintant states that PPL has increased monthly bill to recover alleged under charge. Complaintant states that PP Lshould have checked the meter within five years as they are required and then the problem could have been resoilved with less expenses. Complaintant did not know they were being underbilled. Complaintant states if underbilled, PPLshould not be allowed to recove rmore tha ntwo years worth of billing. Complaintant states the amoun tadded is ove rthe legal limit. Complaintant states late charge has been added for disputed amount. Complaintant wants th ebill adjusted to legal amount and finance charge reversed. |
| F-2011-2267817 | Closed | 10/7/2011 | Complaintant states that they have paid PPL $2187. Complaintant states that their electric usage was $2400, and complaintant states that they have paid $616 in February and $756 in April 2011. Complaintant states thatPPL added budget amount of $708.76 and wants a $500 security deposit. Complaintant wants budget amount removed since it is no tbased on actual charges. Complaintant also wants security deposit removed. |
| F-2011-2272809 | Closed | 11/7/2011 | Complaintant states that they have paid to much on their bill. Complaintant states that they do not use that much elkectricity and they live by themself. Complaintant states that they believe their meter is defective and that the company has been estimating their bill. Complaintant would like a hearing before a Administrative Law Judge. |
| C-2011-2266069 | Closed | 9/28/2011 | Complaintant states that they just want to have an affordable payment plan for their bill. Complaintant states that they would like to pay no more than $150 a month. |
| F-2011-2279310 | Closed | 12/7/2011 | Complaintant states that they moved into their residenceat 2128 North 3RD Street November 1, and does not want to be responsible for paying the bill prior to that date. Complaintant states that they had a active account at 2051/2 West High Street in Elizabethtown up to October 31, 2011. Complaintant wants charges prior to November 1, 2011 at his current residence to be removed from the bill. |
| F-2011-2274494 | Closed | 11/17/2011 | Complaintant states that they need a reduced payment agreement, due to reduced income. Complaintant wants the payment agreement to be reasonable compared to her income. |
| C-2011-2267444 | Closed | 10/5/2011 | Complaintant states that they need their budget paymentlowered, as a result of a new thermostat and less people residing in the residence. Complaintant states that he highest they can go monthly is $500 - $550 per month. |
| F-2011-2270246 | Closed | 10/19/2011 | Complaintant states that they tried to get help on past due amount. Complaintant states that PPL would not accept $200 a month on past due amount and they only get $758 monthly, and her brother has no income at the time. Complaintant states that PPL is asking for $600 a month, which complaintant cannot afford. Complaintant states that they would like to pay $200 a month on past due amount and stay current with monthly bill. Complaintant states they will get help with payments by the IHEAP Program. |
| C-2011-2251784 | Closed | 6/27/2011 | Complaintant states that they want PPL to repay them $1000 for their Home owner's deductable and food that was thrown out, due to inaccurate information on when power would be restored following a storm. Storm occurred May 26, and power was restored May 29. |
| F-2011-2274057 | Closed | 11/14/2011 | Complaintant states that they want the PUC to order the company to set up a payment agreement, where they will pay current bill plus additional $50 unti lbalance is paid in full. |
| C-2011-2273645 | Closed | 11/15/2011 | Complaintant states that they were installing ground mounted photovoltaic generation generation panels. Compaintant states that PPL was suppose to set up net Metering Rider Tariff. Complaintant states that he owns property where solar panels are located. Complaintant had his solar panels mounted, inspected and approved by PPL Electric. Complainant states that he is unsure if PPL is following all the rules and guidelines of the Net Metering Rider and the Commission's rules. Complaintant has received checks from PPL with no explanatoin of them.Complaintant states that since August 2010, he has not received credit for the electricity generated from his solar panels and delivered to PPL. Complaintant states that a representative of PPL recommended to PPL management that Virtual Net Metering be applied to Complaintant's account. Complaintant wants PPL to be ordered to apply Net Metering to Complaintant's accounts by monthly at full retail rate for solar power generated. Complaintant also wants to disclose the kilowatt hours of elecricity that has been generated by Complaintant's solar panels and delivered to PPL each month since March 2009. Complaintant wants disclosed all credits and payments for electricity that have been made. |
| F-2011-2266037 | Closed | 9/27/2011 | Complaintant states thatthe payment plan is to high and that she would like another payment plan. |
| F-2011-2268176 | Closed | 10/14/2011 | Complaintant states thatthey cannot afford the payment plan set up by PUC and PPL electric. Complaintant states that they are still waiting for OnTrack to call back. Complaintant would like a lower payment plan that is affordable, as s the yonly get $463.87 every two weeks, and have other bills to pay. |
| C-2011-2265343 | Closed | 9/20/2011 | Complaintant states their balance is backed up since 2010, because of a hip injury leaving then with no income from mid October to end of January. Complaintant states that they were on assistance with four mortgage payments to pay. Complaintant could not qualify for LIHHEAP. Complaintant states that PPL terminated service and added a $300 security deposit. Complaintant would like a resonable extra amount added to their budget that is affordable. |
| F-2011-2263257 | Closed | 9/12/2011 | Complaintant states their bill was higher at a previous address than their current bill. Complaintant states that since the bill exceeded $100, and their current bill is $50, that they suspect that they ewere paying someone else's electric bill as wel as their bill. Complaintant would like a thorough investigation of the wiring and hot water usage. Complaintant only wants to pay their usage. |
| C-2012-2291588 | Closed | 3/1/2012 | Complaintant states their complaint is against Calculation of the Generation Supply Charge-1 for the Application Period March 1, 2012 through May 31, 2012. Complainant wants PUC to investigate the proposed GSC-1 and reject the proposed GSC-1 to the extent required to insure PPL Electric's rates are lawful. |
| F-2009-2113220 | Closed | 6/10/2009 | Complaintant states there are incorrect charges on her bill. |
| F-2011-2267807 | Closed | 10/7/2011 | Complaintant states they want a reasonable payment agreement they can afford. Complaintant states they can only pay $50 to $75 a month. |
| C-20042934 | Closed | 4/30/2004 | COMPLAINTANT WANTS A LOWER PAYMENT ARRANGEMENT. |
| F-2011-2267411 | Closed | 10/5/2011 | Complaintnat states that PPL stated someone in Complaintant's house was seriously ill and needed sevices restored. Complaintant states that PPL turned off services. Complaintant states that PUC established a Payment plan. Complaintant would like a reduced payment plan. Complaintant has high medical bills and needs to have a lower payment agreement to afford the bills. |
| C-2018-3000078 | Active | 2/26/2018 | Complaints are having a safety problem with their utility service Complainants claim that an installation of a wireless smart meter on their property will be detrimental to their health Complainants allege that an installation of wireless smart meters on their neighbors' properties has already brought about negative health side effects on them Complainants request that the PUC compel coerce the utility to abide by the demands of Section 1501 of the Public Utility Code and Section 57.194 of the PUC's regulations to provide safe and reasonable service to them |
| C-00992121 | Closed | 2/2/1999 | COMPLANANT STATES THEY HAD A CONTRACT WITH PP&L FOR OPTIONAL INTERRUPTIBLE SERVICE UNDER RATE SCHEDULE IS-P, AND SHOP VAC CLAIMS THAT PP&L HAS ADMINIS- TERED ASSESSMENT OF PENALTY AGAINST THEM, IN SUCH A WAY AS TO PROVIDE PP&L WITH A SUBSTANTIAL WINDFALL AT THE EXPENSE OF SHOP VAC |
| C-2012-2304555 | Closed | 5/3/2012 | Complaoinant states that they cannot afford the PUC's payment agreement.Complainant would like a lower payment agreement. |
Showing results 9476 - 9500 of 11830
Need More Help?
If you can't find what you're looking for here, please contact the PA Public Utility Commission. Call us at 1-800-692-7380 or contact us online.
Document Search
Public utility documents available electronically include case dockets, public meeting orders and more.
Filing & Resources
Find utility-related reports, laws and regulations, federal filings, tariffs, procedures and more.
eFILING
Consumers, utilities and attorneys can save time by submitting documents to the PUC electronically.
