Utility Code 110500
The Utility Detail View displays the Utility Information (identified by Utility Code - 110500), authorities, and case information associated with that utility.
Basic Utility Information
Utility Name
PPL ELECTRIC UTILITIES CORP
Utility Code
110500
Utility Type
Electric
Utility Status
Active
Carrier ID
Utility Contact Information
Physical Address
Mailing Address
TWO NORTH NINTH STREET
ALLENTOWN PA 18101
Phone
610-774-5696
Fax
610-774-4102
Website
www.pplweb.com
Email
KKLOCK@PPLWEB.COM
Utility Authorities Information
| Service Type | Authority Status | Date Certified | Suspension Date | Suspension Expiration | Application Number | Trading As Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Distributor | Active | A-110500 | PPL UTILITIES (PPL) |
Utility Insurance Information
No insurance information for this utility.
EGS Territories Serviced by a Utility
Residential
No
Citizens’ Electric
No
Small Commercial
Duquesne Light
No
Mixed Meter
Met-Ed
No
Large Commercial
No
PECO
No
Industrial
No
Penelec
No
Governmental
No
Penn Power
No
Pike
No
PPL
No
UGI Utilities - Electric
No
Wellsboro
No
West Penn Power
No
Docketed Cases
| Docket Number | Case Status | Date Filed | Allegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-00970333 | Closed | 5/5/1997 | COMPLAINANT WISHES TO BE PLACED ON BUDGET PLAN, DUE TO ALLEGED FINANCIAL HARDSHIP. |
| C-00970355 | Closed | 5/5/1997 | COMPLAINANT ALLEGES OVER-BILLING AND ILL-MANNERED TREATEMENT BY COMPANY REPS. |
| C-00970358 | Closed | 5/12/1997 | COMPLAINANTS WISH THEIR MONTHLY PAYMENT ARRANGEMENT LOWERED DUE TO ALLEGED PERSONAL, FINANCIAL AND MEDICAL PROBLEMS. COMPLAINANTS ALSO FEEL THEIR BILLS ARE TOO HIGH RELATIVE TO THE AMOUNT OF ELECTRICY THEY USE. |
| C-00970370 | Closed | 5/9/1997 | COMPLAINANT ALLEGES COMPANY HAS CHANGED HER RATE AND IS BACK-CHARGING HER FOR USAGE BASED ON AN OLD CONTRACT ORIGINALLY DRAWN UP WITH A PRIOR OWNER. COMP- LAINANT AVERS SHE HAD NO KNOWLEDGE OF THIS CONTRACT. |
| C-00970396 | Closed | 5/16/1997 | COMPLAINANT SAYS HE CAN'T RECEIVE UNEMPLOYMENT BENEFITS BECAUSE OF PHYSICAL CONDITION, AND ONLY RECEIVES $102.50 EVERY TWO WEEKS FROM PUBLIC ASSISTANCE. |
| C-00970411 | Closed | 5/27/1997 | COMPLAINANT IS REQUESTING A LOWER MONTHLY PAYMENT BECAUSE SHE CANNOT AFFORD REQUESTED PAYMENT BY RESPONDENT BECAUSE OF LOW MONTHLY INCOME. |
| C-00970424 | Closed | 5/29/1997 | COMPLAINANT WOULD LIKE THE PUC TO INVESTIGATE TO SEE IF THE AMOUNT OF HIS ELECTRIC BILL IS CORRECT. |
| C-00970433 | Closed | 6/2/1997 | COMPLAINANTS STATE THAT THEY MOVED INTO THE LANDMARK APARTMENT BUILDING IN BRODHEADSVILLE, PA, IN SEPTEMBER 1995. COMPLAINANTS STATE FIRST ELECTRIC BILL SEEMED HIGH, AND THAT IN NOVEMBER OF 1995 COMPANY FOUND A "FOREIGN LOAD." COMPLAINANT STATES THAT LATER IN THE MONTH, PROBLEMS WERE ASSOCIATED WITH THE COMPANY SWITCHING SERVICE BACK INTO LANDLORD'S NAME, THEN BACK TO THEIR NAME. COMPLAINANTS STATE THAT THEY THEN RECEIVED A NEW ACCOUNT NUMBER, TO WHICH THEY MADE OUT THEIR CHECKS FOR PAYMENT. COMPLAINANTS STATE THAT IN APRIL 1996 THEY APPLIED FOR MORTGAGE AND WERE DENIED FOR UNPAID BILL ON CREDIT RECORD. COMPLAINANTS SAY THAT COMPANY OFFERED TO RESOLVE THE PROBLEM OF MIS-APPLIED PAYMENTS, BUT THAT IN SEPTEMBER OF 1996, COMPLAINANTS WERE DENIED A CAR LOAN DUE TO ANOTHER BAD MARK ON CREDIT REPORT. COMPLAINANTS WOULD LIKE THEIR CREDIT REPORT TO BE CLEARED. |
| C-00970443 | Closed | 6/2/1997 | COMPLAINANT SAYS RESPONDENT CLAIMS ELECTRICAL PROBLEMS AT THEIR HOME ARE NOT DUE TO FAULTY CURRENT COMING FROM THEIR ELECTRICAL LINES. COMPLAINANT BE- LIEVES RESPONDENT NEEDS TO UPGRADE THEIR EQUIPMENT AND NEEDS TO KNOW WHY IT WAS NECESSARY TO PUT AN EXTRA GROUND ON THEIR TRANSFORMER POLE AND TWO EXTRA GROUNDS ON THE HOUSE AS THEY ARE GETTING 7 VOLTS OF CURRENT COMING IN AND STILL NOT GETTING PROPER ELECTRICAL SERVICE. |
| C-00970444 | Closed | 6/2/1997 | COMPLAINANT ALLEGES SHE IS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR PAST DUE BILLS. PREVIOUS TENANTS SHOULD BE BILLED. |
| C-00970461 | Closed | 6/4/1997 | COMPLAINANT STATES SHE TALKED TO A CUSTOMER SERVICE REPRESENTATIVE PRIOR TO MOVING INTO HER APARTMENT TO GET AN IDEA OF COST. SHE WAS TOLD HER BILL WOULD BE PRORATED FROM THE PREVIOUS TENANT BUT WHEN SHE RECEIVED HER FIRST BILL IT WAS MORE THAN SHE THOUGHT SHE SHOULD HAVE TO PAY. SHE WOULD LIKE HER BILL TO BE RECALCULATED FOR THE SERVICE USED. SHE IS WILLING TO PAY 30% OF THE BILL DUE WHICH WOULD BE MORE OF AN ACCURATE AMOUNT AND WOULD LIKE A PAY- MENT ARRANGEMENT TO DO SO. |
| C-00970471 | Closed | 6/25/1997 | COMPLAINANT STATES HE INADVERTENTLY MAILED THE WRONG CHECK TO RESPONDENT AND INFORMED THEM OF SAME WITH A TELEPHONE CALL. RESPONDENT CASHED THE CHECK AND COMPLAINANT WAITED A MONTH TO RECEIVE A CHECK IN RETURN. COMPLAINANT WOULD LIKE A COPY OF RESPONDENT'S ESTABLISHED PROCEDURES FOR A CASE LIKE THIS AS HE FEELS HE WAS LIED TO AND HAD TO WAIT TOO LONG FOR THE REFUND OF HIS MONEY. |
| C-00970472 | Closed | 6/25/1997 | COMPLAINANT STATES SHE CALLED RESPONDENT AND TOLD THEM SHE WAS DISABLED AND ALSO HAD TRAGEDY IN THE FAMILY WHICH CAUSED PROBLEMS IN PAYING HER BILL. SHE SAYS SHE CAN PAY A SMALL AMOUNT BUT NOT THE REQUIRED AMOUNT. |
| C-00970537 | Closed | 7/14/1997 | COMPLAINANT, AN INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMER OF ELECTRIC SERVICE, STATES THAT IT HAD BEEN RECEIVING ELECTRIC SERVICE AT AN INTERRUPTIBLE RATE OF ELECTRIC SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH ELECTRIC TARIFF PA. P.U.C. NO. 200, RATE SCHEDULE LP-4. DUE TO SUPPLEMENT(S) FILED TO THIS TARIFF AND SUBSEQUENT ACTIONS OF THE COMPANY, COMPLAINANT STATES IT HAS NOT BEEN ON THE INTERRUPTIBLE RATE FROM JANUARY 1995 UNTIL SEPTEMBER 1996, DURING WHICH TIME COMPLAINANT STATES IT PAID GREATER THAN $650,000 MORE FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE THAN IT WOULD HAVE UNDER THE INTERRUPTIBLE RATE. COMPLAINANT WOULD LIKE THE COMPANY TO: 1) APPLY IN- TERRUPTIBLE RATE TO COMPLAINANT RETROACTIVE TO JANUARY 18, 1995, THE DATE OF ITS INITIAL APPLICATION; OR 2) APPLY THE INTERRUPTIBLE RATE TO COMPLAINANT RETROACTIVE TO SEPTEMBER 28, 1995. |
| C-00970546 | Closed | 7/18/1997 | COMPLAINANT STATES SHE IS NOT WORKING AT THIS TIME AND CANNOT AFFORD TO HAVE HER ELECTRICITY CUT OFF. COMPLAINANT WISHES MORE TIME OR A LOWER BUDGET FOR PAYING HER BILL. |
| C-00970571 | Closed | 7/21/1997 | COMPLAINANT STATES HE DISAGREES WITH THE FINDINGS AND STATES HE WAS NOT LIVIN IN THE HOUSE FOR LONG PERIODS OF TIME. COMPLAINANT WOULD LIKE HIS BILL TO BE CORRECTED AND WOULD LIKE A PUBLIC HEARING. |
| C-00970583 | Closed | 7/30/1997 | COMPLAINANT STATES THE MONTHLY PAYMENTS ARE TOO HIGH. COMPLAINANT WOULD LIKE TO BE PUT ON A LOWER PAYMENT PLAN. |
| C-00970606 | Closed | 7/28/1997 | COMPLAINANT, AN INDUSTRIAL CUSTOMER OF ELECTRIC SERVICE, STATES THAT COMPANY FILED ELECTRIC TARIFF PA. P.U.C. NO. 200, INCLUDING RATE SCHEDULE "IS-T INT- ERRUPTIBLE LARGE GENERAL SERVICE AT 69,000 VOLTS OR HIGHER. COMPLAINANT ALSO STATES THAT ON SEPTEMBER 21, 1995, IT SENT A LETTER TO PP&L EXPRESSING INTER- EST IN BEING PLACED ON THE INTERRUPTIBLE RATE. COMPLAINANT STATES IT MEETS THE REQUIREMENTS FOR A SUBSCRIPTION TO THE IS-T RATE, BUT STATES THAT COMPANY HAD REPEATEDLY REFUSED COMPLAINANT'S REQUESTS TO BE PLACED ON THE INTERRUPTI- BLE RATE. COMPLAINANT STATED THAT ON OR ABOUT DECEMBER 1996, COMPANY FORWARD- ED A CONTRACT FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE UNDER RATE SCHEDULE IS-T, WITH A RETRO- ACTIVE DATE OF SEPTEMBER 1996, WHICH DOES NOT ADDRESS THE ONE YEAR PERIOD BE- TWEEN SEPTEMBER 1995 AND SEPTEMBER 1996. COMPLAINANT STATES THAT BECAUSE OF NOT BEING PLACED ON THE INTERRUPTIBLE RATE, IT PAID MORE THAN $10,000 PER MONTH MORE FOR ELECTRIC SERVICE FROM SEPTEMBER 1995 TO SEPTEMBER 1996 THAN IT WOULD HAVE UNDER THE INTERRUPTIBLE RATE. COMPLAINANT WOULD LIKE TO: 1) HAVE INTERRUPTIBLE RATE APPLIED RETROACTIVE TO SEPTEMBER 28, 1995; 2) BE PLACED ON THE INTERRUPTIBLE POWER RATE EFFECTIVE IMMEDIATELY; 3) RECEIVE ANY OTHER RE- LIEF THAT COMMISSION IS AUTHORIZED TO ORDER. |
| C-00970611 | Closed | 8/4/1997 | COMPLAINANT STATES THE MONTHLY PAYMENTS ARE TOO HIGH. COMPLAINANT WOULD LIKE TO BE PUT ON A LOWER PAYMENT PLAN. |
| C-00970612 | Closed | 8/4/1997 | COMPLAINANT STATES THE MONTHLY PAYMENTS ARE TOO HIGH. COMPLAINANT WOULD LIKE TO BE PUT ON A LOWER PAYMENT PLAN. |
| C-00970620 | Closed | 7/8/1997 | COMPLAINANT STATES CABLES WERE BURIED ON THE COMPLAINANTS LAND WITHOUT PER- MISSION AND ROBERT L BOYER EXCEEDED THE COURT ORDER FOR CONSTRUCTING THE RIGHT OF WAY OF 10 FEET. COMPLAINANT WOULD LIKE THE CABLES BE PLACED WITHIN THE 10 FT RIGHT OF WAY AS SPECIFIED BY THE COURT ORDER AND REPAIRS FOR DAMAGE TO THE PROPERTY. |
| C-00970629 | Closed | 8/11/1997 | COMPLAINANT STATES THE MONTHLY PAYMENTS ARE TOO HIGH. COMPLAINANT WOULD LIKE TO BE PUT ON A LOWER PAYMENT PLAN |
| C-00970649 | Closed | 8/18/1997 | COMPLAINANTS STATE THAT THEIR RENTAL UNIT WAS INSPECTED FOR FOREIGN LOAD, WHICH WAS CORRECTED. COMPLAINANTS STATE THAT THE COMPANY INCORRECTLY HANDLED PLACING THE SERVICE IN THEIR NAMES AND BACK INTO THE TENANT'S NAME, LEAVING THEM WITH A BILL THAT THEY SAY THEY SHOULD NOT BE RESPONSIBLE FOR. |
| C-00970680 | Closed | 8/21/1997 | COMPLAINTANT STATES A BILL IN AUG 96 AND PAID IT AND NO OTHER BILLS WERE RE- CEIVED SO THE CO WAS CONTACTED AND TO FIND OUT THAT THE NEIGHBOR RECEIVED THE BILL AND PAID THE CO AND THE COMPLAINANT WOULD HAVE TO REIMBURSE THE NEIGHBOR FOR $329.85. COMPLAINANT STATES A MONTHLY PAYMENT PLAN HAS BEEN SET UP OF THE MONTHLY BILL PLUS $5 BUT THE CONCERN IS DID THE NEIGHBOR RECEIVE REIMBURSMENT OR IS PPL RECEIVING DOUBLE PAYMENTS? COMPLAINANT WOULD LIKE AN INVESTIGATION DONE ON THIS MATER. |
| C-00970726 | Closed | 8/29/1997 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT COMPANY NEVER GAVE HER A CORRECT ESTIMATE OF THE EL- ECTRIC BILL AT HER APARTMENT. COMPLAINANT STATES THAT THE ESTIMATE SHE ASKED FOR BEFORE RENTING HER APARTMENT WAS BASED ON OLDER FIGURES. COMPLAINANT STATES HIGH BILLS ARE DEPLETING HER FIXED INCOME. |
Showing results 1751 - 1775 of 11733
Need More Help?
If you can't find what you're looking for here, please contact the PA Public Utility Commission. Call us at 1-800-692-7380 or contact us online.
Document Search
Public utility documents available electronically include case dockets, public meeting orders and more.
Filing & Resources
Find utility-related reports, laws and regulations, federal filings, tariffs, procedures and more.
eFILING
Consumers, utilities and attorneys can save time by submitting documents to the PUC electronically.
