Utility Code 110550
The Utility Detail View displays the Utility Information (identified by Utility Code - 110550), authorities, and case information associated with that utility.
Basic Utility Information
Utility Name
PECO ENERGY COMPANY-ELECTRIC
Utility Code
110550
Utility Type
Electric
Utility Status
Active
Carrier ID
Utility Contact Information
Physical Address
Mailing Address
2301 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA PA 19101
Phone
Fax
Website
www.exeloncorp.com/
Utility Authorities Information
| Service Type | Authority Status | Date Certified | Suspension Date | Suspension Expiration | Application Number | Trading As Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Distributor | Active |
Utility Insurance Information
No insurance information for this utility.
EGS Territories Serviced by a Utility
Residential
No
Citizens’ Electric
No
Small Commercial
Duquesne Light
No
Mixed Meter
Met-Ed
No
Large Commercial
No
PECO
No
Industrial
No
Penelec
No
Governmental
No
Penn Power
No
Pike
No
PPL
No
UGI Utilities - Electric
No
Wellsboro
No
West Penn Power
No
Docketed Cases
| Docket Number | Case Status | Date Filed | Allegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-00992725 | Closed | 8/13/1999 | COMPLAINANT STATES CUSTOMER CHARGE OF $5.10 IS A DUPLICATE CHARGE, WANTS $5.10 RETURNED TO HER FROM ALL PREVIOUS BILLS. |
| C-00003870 | Closed | 7/7/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES CUTOMERS WITH EXISTING "OFF-PEAK" METERS CONTINUE TO BE CHARGED A MONTHLY FEE TO HAVE POWER SHUT-OFF DURING "PEAK" TIMES (GENERATING REVENUE & SAVINGS FOR PECO) EVEN WHEN THEY CHOOSE AN ALTERNATE ENERGY GENERAT ION SUPPLIER. SHE STATES THEY HAD TO SPEND $125 TO HAVE THEIR POWER RE-WIRED SO THAT THEY WOULDN'T BE CHARGED & INVONVENIENCED FOR NO GAIN UNDER THE EXIS- TING PECO SYSTEM. THEY WANT THE RULES CHANGED RE: OFF-PEAK SERVICE TO REFL- ECT THE IMPACT OF ENERGY CHOICE AND REQUIRE PECO TO REFUND THE FEES TAKEN FROM CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE CHOSEN ALTERNATE SUPPLIERS. |
| C-20066780 | Closed | 8/28/2006 | COMPLAINANT STATES DAMAGED UNDERGROUND LINES CAN NOT BE FIXED UNTIL PECO ACKNOWLEDGES THE LINES BELONG TO THEM. THEY WOULD LIKE THE PUC TO MAKE PECO RESPOND TO ISSUE AND ACT AS MEDIATOR TO GET PROBLEMS RESOLVED. |
| F-00569922 | Closed | 11/22/1999 | COMPLAINANT STATES DECEMBER METER READING WAS ESTIMATED AND NOT AN ACTUAL READING (DECEMBER 8, 1998). PECO ESTIMATED HER METER READING ON TOO MANY NUMEROUS OCCASIONS DURING THE FIVE YEARS THAT SHE HAS LIVED AT ONE MILL BEND ROAD. WANTS TO HAVE PECO ADMIT THAT ALL METER READINGS IN FIVE YEAR PERIOD WHILE SHE LIVED AT 1 MILL BEND ROAD WERE NOT ALL ACTUAL READINGS. SHE KNOWS THAT SHE OWES THEM SOMETHING, WHICH WOULD BE REASONABLE, BUT SHE DOESN'T OWE A FULL AMOUNT OF $339.09. |
| C-00992581 | Closed | 6/28/1999 | COMPLAINANT STATES DECISION MADE WAS FOR HER TO PAY $1,000 BY JULY 6, 1999, DON'T HAVE A LUMP SUM ACCESS TO ANY MONEY. WOULD LIKE TO NOT HAVE TO PAY THE $1,000 AT ONE TIME BY JULY 6, THERE IS NO WAY THIS CAN BE DONE. |
| C-00992577 | Closed | 6/24/1999 | COMPLAINANT STATES DECISION MADE WOULD HAVE BEEN IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO ADHERE TO AT THIS TIME. WOULD LIKE TO PAY $25 PER MONTH EXTRA UNTIL ACCOUNT BECOMES CURRENT. |
| C-20077759 | Closed | 5/3/2007 | COMPLAINANT STATES DELAYS IN GETTING ON PAYMENT PLAN DUE TO MISINFORMATION GIVEN. SHE WOULD LIKE THE PUC TO HELP SET UP AN AFFORDABLE PAYMENT PLAN. |
| F-02147527 | Closed | 3/12/2007 | COMPLAINANT STATES DEPOSIT CHARGE IS NOT JUSTIFIED UNDER PECO'S TARIFF. SHE WOULD LIKE THE PUC TO INSTRUCT PECO TO REMOVE DEPOSIT CHARGE FROM ACCOUNT DUE TO GOOD CREDIT RATING WHICH DOES NOT JUSTIFY A DEPOSIT. |
| C-00971018 | Closed | 12/3/1997 | COMPLAINANT STATES DID NOT HAVE THE OPTION TO PICK THE ELECTRIC COMPANY COM- PLAINANT WANTED AND WOULD LIKE TO VOICE AN OPINION |
| F-00479760 | Closed | 6/9/1999 | COMPLAINANT STATES DIDN'T LIKE THE REASON FOR THE HIGH BILL, THEY SAID THAT WE HAVE POTENTIAL TO USE THAT MUCH ELECTRIC ALSO IN THAT BILL TIME THEY WERE AWAY FOR A WEEK. WOULD LIKE BALANCE TAKEN OFF OF BILL. |
| Z-01765144 | Closed | 11/23/2004 | COMPLAINANT STATES DISAGREES WITH WHAT THE PAYMENT AMOUNT SHOULD BE. THE COMPLAINANT WOULD LIKE THE PUC TO HELP HIM GET A FAIR PAYMENT PLAN. |
| Z-01104979 | Closed | 5/22/2002 | COMPLAINANT STATES DISPUTES THE TWO ESTIMATED BILLS HE RECEIVED FOR THE TIME HIS METER WAS BROKE. HE STATES NOW THAT THE METER IS FIXED EVERYTHING HAS BEEN FINE. OTHER THEN THE COMPANY EXPECTS HIM TO PAY THE BACK ESTIMATED BILL |
| C-20054550 | Closed | 4/4/2005 | COMPLAINANT STATES DO TO THE PHYSICAL CONDITION OF THE LOW PRESSURE MAIN IS SUCH THAT,DURING PERIODS OF RAIN OR SNOWMELT,SIGNIFICANT QUANTITIES OF WATER LEAK INTO THE PIPES. COMPLAINANT STATES THAT THESE CONDITION HAVE OCCURRED SEVERAL TIMES EACH WINTER. |
| C-00981594 | Closed | 6/25/1998 | COMPLAINANT STATES DOES NOT OWE MONEY AND WAS IN ANOTHER PERSONS NAME AND WOULD LIKE THE ADJUSTMENTS MADE |
| C-20042462 | Closed | 2/17/2004 | COMPLAINANT STATES DOES NOT WANT THE AGREEMENT AND STATES DOES NOT USE THAT MUCH ELECTRIC, THE BUDGET OF $74 A MONTH IS TOO MUCH. |
| C-00971007 | Closed | 11/20/1997 | COMPLAINANT STATES DOES NOT WANT TO BE ON THE BUDGET AND WOULD LIKE TO BE RE- MOVED. |
| Z-01269740 | Closed | 3/10/2003 | COMPLAINANT STATES DOES NOT WHY HER BILL WAS SO HIGH. SHE IS ON THE CAP PROGRAM AND WOULD LIKE HER BILL TO STAY AT $55 MONTHLY LIKE IT IS NOW. |
| C-00992663 | Closed | 7/22/1999 | COMPLAINANT STATES DOESN'T KNOW HOW TOTAL AMOUNT DUE ACCUMALATED AS HIGH AS IT IS OVER $1,000, BECAUSE SHE STATES SHE IS NEVER HOME. WOULD LIKE FOR SOMEONE TO COME OUT TO INVESTIAGE BECAUSE ELECTRIC BILL SHOULD HAVE NEVER REACHED $1,000 OR IT SHOULDN'T NEVER GOTTEN OVER A $100. |
| C-00992841 | Closed | 9/27/1999 | COMPLAINANT STATES DOESN'T WISH, NOR IS IT FAIR FOR HIM TO PAY EXTRA ON HIS ELECTRIC BILL, HAVING THE MONEY GOING INTO FUMO'S DELAWARE VALLEY REGIONAL ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT FUND. THESE CHARGES AREN'T LISTED ON HIS BILL. THE MONEY THEY RECEIVE FROM HIS BILL HAS NO AUDIT AUTHORITY/REQUIRMENT & DOESN'T HAVE TO SEEK APPROVAL. HE DEMANDS REMOVAL OF EXTRA CHARGES FOR SOMETHING HE DOESN'T BUY OR GET. |
| F-2009-2139354 | Closed | 11/2/2009 | Complainant states down payment and payment plan are too high. They would like the PUC to lower down payment and payment plan to an affordable amount. |
| C-20028407 | Closed | 8/29/2002 | COMPLAINANT STATES DUE TO A DELINQUENCY WITH CAP PROGRAM , PECO WOULD NOT LET HER MAKE OTHER ARRANGEMENTS AND WANTS TO SUSPEND SERVICES. SHE WANTS PUC TO MEDIATE AN AGREEMENT BETWEEN PECO AND HER SO HER SERVICE WON'T BE SUSPENDED. |
| C-2017-2583425 | Closed | 1/9/2017 | Complainant states due to a financial hardship he would like a payment arrangement, but was told he does not qualify because he has an active bankruptcy proceeding. |
| C-20042449 | Closed | 2/12/2004 | COMPLAINANT STATES DUE TO ALL ADDITIONAL CHARGES TO THE GAS ANE ELECTRIC USAGE, THE MONTHLY BILLS ARE MUCH TOO HIGH. HE FEELS THAT SOMETHING SHOULD BE DONE TO AVOID HIGH BILLS. |
| C-00015344 | Closed | 4/26/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES DUE TO BEING OUT OF WORK, WITH NO INCOME AT THIS PARTICUL- AR TIME, HER ELECTRIC BILL PAYMENTS FELL BEHIND. SHE WAS UNABLE TO CATCH UP. SHE CONTACTED THE PUC FOR ASSISTANCE, THEY GAVE HER A PAYMENT OF $196 WITHIN THE NEXT TWO DAYS, THEN $125 + $10 MONTHLY. SHE STATES SHE CAN'T AFFORD THAT MUCH MONEY SO SOON. SHE STATES SHE WOULD APPRECIATE THE PUC REDUCE THE AMOUNT OF MONEY SHE NEEDS TO COME UP WITH. ALSO IF THEY COULD REDUCE THE MONTHLY PAYMENTS AT LEAST UNTIL SHE RETURNS TO WORK. |
| Z-01614403 | Closed | 4/14/2004 | COMPLAINANT STATES DUE TO FINANCIAL DIFFICULTY, IT IS HARD FOR HER TO PAY THE $641 IN THE DECISION. SHE WOULD LIKE SOME HELP WITH HER SITUATION. |
Showing results 4376 - 4400 of 13407
Need More Help?
If you can't find what you're looking for here, please contact the PA Public Utility Commission. Call us at 1-800-692-7380 or contact us online.
Document Search
Public utility documents available electronically include case dockets, public meeting orders and more.
Filing & Resources
Find utility-related reports, laws and regulations, federal filings, tariffs, procedures and more.
eFILING
Consumers, utilities and attorneys can save time by submitting documents to the PUC electronically.
