Utility Code 110550
The Utility Detail View displays the Utility Information (identified by Utility Code - 110550), authorities, and case information associated with that utility.
Basic Utility Information
Utility Name
PECO ENERGY COMPANY-ELECTRIC
Utility Code
110550
Utility Type
Electric
Utility Status
Active
Carrier ID
Utility Contact Information
Physical Address
Mailing Address
2301 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA PA 19101
Phone
Fax
Website
www.exeloncorp.com/
Utility Authorities Information
| Service Type | Authority Status | Date Certified | Suspension Date | Suspension Expiration | Application Number | Trading As Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Distributor | Active |
Utility Insurance Information
No insurance information for this utility.
EGS Territories Serviced by a Utility
Residential
No
Citizens’ Electric
No
Small Commercial
Duquesne Light
No
Mixed Meter
Met-Ed
No
Large Commercial
No
PECO
No
Industrial
No
Penelec
No
Governmental
No
Penn Power
No
Pike
No
PPL
No
UGI Utilities - Electric
No
Wellsboro
No
West Penn Power
No
Docketed Cases
| Docket Number | Case Status | Date Filed | Allegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| Z-00301466 | Closed | 3/22/1996 | COMPLAINTANT IS DISPUTING AND REQUESTING A REVIEW OF BILLING................. |
| Z-00219784 | Closed | 11/30/1993 | COMPLAINTANT REQUESTS A LOWER PAYMENT AGREEMENT |
| C-2011-2280479 | Closed | 12/20/2011 | Complaintant states they always paid their bill on time, but received a bill for $751.49 transfer from property uses by multiple owners. Complaintant States that he charge does not belong to them.Complaintant states that they want the charge removed from their account, and was posted without reasonable grounds. |
| F-2009-2106874 | Closed | 5/8/2009 | Complaintant states charges on bill not hers. She would like the PUC to help get service and remove charges that are not hers. |
| F-2011-2272299 | Closed | 11/1/2011 | Complaintant states that a bill came in the mail for $56.83, with a balance of the bill being $121.25. Complaintant states that this is before the credit of $64.42 was added from a Liheap grant.Complaintant states she is suppose to be on the Cap Rate Program, but recieved a bill to pay $36.00 to begin budget biling. Complaintant states that if she was already on budgetbilling her bill would not have been $121.25 and her credit would coverthe bill for August that she did not receive until September. Complaintant states that she is disputing her August bill. Complaintant wants it credited, since it was PECO's mistake. |
| C-2011-2267397 | Closed | 10/4/2011 | Complaintant states that because of power outages, full shifts have been lost. Complaintant states that there has been numerous other days with electric interruptions lasting hours causing work to stop. Complaintant states that PECO had a above ground cable runnin gfrom one manhole to another manhole continuosly getting runned over by trucks. Complaintant states that PECO promised to put the cable back undergound and failed to ge tit done. Complaintant states cable was finally put underground on September 26, but said other cables needed replaced as well. Complaintant states the job is still incomplete. Complaintant states that figurin gout total cost of outages and disruptions is hard, but Peco should realize the importance of the problem and if not be prepared for legal action. |
| F-2011-2268120 | Closed | 10/13/2011 | Complaintant states that he ending up falling behind on his bill due to a broken arm. Complaintant called PECO for a payment arrangement and was told he needed to pay $1000, which he could no tafford in one large payment. Complaintnat states that PECO keeps adding charges to make the past due amount higher. Complaintant states that PECO said he broke a agreement wit hthe PUC, but complaintant says that when he called the PUC there was no agreement.Complaintant states that he is trying to pa off bill, but needs help with a payment plan that is affordable. |
| F-2011-2265603 | Closed | 9/21/2011 | Complaintant states that he had to declare bankruptcy due to financial lost and relies on electricity to operate medical equipment for his wife's battery charged electrical harness for her heart pump. Complaintnat also states due to a unreliable gas furnace they rely on electrical heaters. Complaintnat wants a payment plan that is reduced from the current $200 a month bill. |
| F-2011-2268171 | Closed | 10/14/2011 | Complaintant states that he wants the bill to be placed in his name. Complaintant states that while he was in jail he did not see or pay any bills. Complaintant states that company gave false information about changing the bill in his name and making payment arrangement. Complaintant states tha this ex-wife handled all the bills. Complaintant did not know how much was owed and would like a payment arrangement that is affordable to pay back the amount owed. |
| F-2011-2258555 | Closed | 8/19/2011 | Complaintant states that he was late paying his bill, and was not told this would disqualify him from PUC mandated pay schedule. Complainant would like a reasonable payment agreement.Complainant also wants relief for late fees, reconnection fees, and deposit fees. |
| F-2011-2270924 | Closed | 10/20/2011 | Complaintant states that her complaints starts in 2008, when she paid one bill electronicaly, and PECO stated she was enrolled in on-line billing.Complaintant states that she called to be taken off on-line billing. Complaintant states that she requested a high bill from PECO and said the bill was correct without checking the meter. Complaintant states that she should not be paying $300 a month for electric, when she does not have electric heat. Complaintant tates since she did not receive a paer bill, she paid the amount she could afford.Complaintant states that she paid $2500 in December and $800 in June and August. Complaintant states that PECO denies that she made a $1048 payment. Complaintant states that she was told since she used a credit card that the payment was unacceptable. Complaintant also says PECO denied complaintant being able to set up a $539 a month automated deduction. Complaintant wants a payment term that is automatically deducted from complaintant's checking account or Complaintant would like to be able to pa with her credit card. |
| C-20027899 | Closed | 5/31/2002 | COMPLAINTANT STATES THAT HIS BUDGET PLAN IS TOO HIGH FOR HIS SALARY AND HE NEEDS TO WORK OUT A LOWER ONE. |
| F-2011-2270945 | Closed | 10/20/2011 | Complaintant states that in August 2009, a call was place to PECO to change the electric bill to James Dandridge, who was a friend of complaintant' s daughter. Complaintant states that in August 2011, Mr. Dandridge moved out and she found out the bill was in his name. Complaintan tstates that on August 19th, 2011 she called PECO to have the bill in her name. Complaintant found out after her application to change service in her name was denied, due to an outstanding balance by Mr. Dandridge. Complaintant states that PECO told her that she was responsible for the balance since she benefited from the service. Complaintant states that she investigated and found out all the bills from 2009 until present had been paid. COmplaintan tstates they called PUC, and was told to pay all bils, which complaintant did.Complaintant states that the PUC representative informed her that Mr. Dandridge had a outstanding balnce at a previous address and when he moved the balance became her responsibility. Complaintant wants the PECO bill in her name and not t obe held responsible for someone else's balance. |
| C-2011-2272850 | Closed | 11/7/2011 | Complaintant states that on August 21, 2011 an electrical surge or disruption occured. Complaintant states the elecric flickered and came back on between 3pm- 3:20pm. Complaintant states that when the electricity came back on the television had blown up, the refridgerator was almost lost as well as a cold/hot water dispenser. Complaintant had found out a wire came down on Audubon Road. Complaintant states that a representative told them that a pole was hit, but no repair work was require to fix the pole. Complaintant states that the stress from the wires being stretched caused the wire to snap and this caused the flickering that destroyed thier appliances. Complaintant states that if PECO would have fixed the problem immediately this would not have occured. Complaintant wants PECO to do the right thingand fix the problem. |
| C-2011-2268126 | Closed | 10/13/2011 | Complaintant states that PECO applied a contract minimum of 560 KW to all of complaintant's bill during non-summer months since June 2008.Complaintnat states that PECO should have applied limits of 200/500 KW with an off-peak maximum of 600 KW. Complaintnat states that PECO's mistake has cost a total of $145,683.55.Complaintant states that PECO placed them on rate GS, instead of a more suitable rate structure. Complaintnat would like refunded for the overcharges or credit between the rates and charges which were imposed under rate GS. Complaintnat would also like pre-judgement cost and other relief that the commission deems appropriate. |
| C-2011-2266511 | Closed | 9/30/2011 | Complaintant states that PECO has broken a agreement by selecting all electric for home owners. Complaintantstates that the basis for agreement was that PECO would share the benefit of higher electric volume for the same capital investment as other homes using other types of heating. Complaintant wants to continue residential heating rates. |
| C-2011-2265608 | Closed | 9/21/2011 | Complaintant states that PECO shut off the power for non-payment. Complaintant states hat due to emergency circumstances a contractor restored service, and they gave PECO $400 of a $700 bill and PECO once again shut off the power. Complaintant states that PECO said that complaintant had no right having someone turning back on the power, but complaintant needed the power for a guest wit ha breathing machine. Complaintant states that the box connected is connected to his house and is his property and the meter is connected to the box. Complaintant states that PECO trespassed on his property to turn off the power.Complaintant states that if PECO wants to shut off power that they can do it from the pole. Complaintnat states that PECOis charging a $925.00 tampering fee and the total bill is $1300 for service t obe restored. Complaintant wants to be treated fairly with shut off notice in advance and to have the tampering fee removed. |
| C-2011-2258632 | Closed | 8/19/2011 | Complaintant states that PECO technician indicated foreign wiring was suspected, as the house is a duplex. Later, another inspecton was requested after no foreign wiring was found. The inspector that came found no foreign wiring. Complaintant states that her name was then taken off the account and she did not owe anything. Complaintant states she then got a letter from a collecton department. Complaintant called PECO and found out the report sasid foreign wiring corrected, which meant she was responsible for al charges. Complaintant wants to know why the report was not corrected, and wants refunded for the amount she paid PECO. |
| C-2011-2268186 | Closed | 10/14/2011 | Complaintant states that she has payment arrangements, but her income is below poverty level. Complaintant states that the payment plans is to much money.Complaintant needs a payment plan they can afford. |
| F-2011-2272191 | Closed | 11/1/2011 | Complaintant states that their electric was shut off without proper notice. Complaintant states since she has had service turned back on their monthly bill, charge amount, credit amount, total bill and balance forward do not add up. Complaintant states they have a re-connect fee, but they never had their service cut off. Complaintant states a nurse called PECO, who was taking care of a relative staying with complaintant and was told a shut off notice would have to be relevent. Complaintant states that three weeks after this call they were told to pa $500 deposit and their monthly bill.Complaintant wants the bill reviewed from September 1, 2010 to July 1, 2011, and for the $500 deposit to be dismissed. Complaintant would liek any credit accued to be put on thei rPECO account. |
| C-2011-2265871 | Closed | 9/23/2011 | Complaintant states that there are incorrect charges on complainants bill. |
| C-2011-2260112 | Closed | 8/29/2011 | Complaintant states that there are incorrect charges on her bill; but would like a payment agreement for the charges she is responsable for. |
| F-2012-2325791 | Closed | 9/17/2012 | Complaintant states that there are incorrect charges on his bill. |
| F-2011-2273271 | Closed | 11/12/2011 | Complaintant states that there are incorrect chrges on her bill, there is a reliability and safety problem with their service, and the y received a shut off notice. Complaintant would like all the agents or representatives to share cost or pay cost.Complaintnat states that they should not have to pay for electric they did not order themself. Complaintant states that they should only have to share bill with their dad. |
| C-2011-2260409 | Closed | 8/29/2011 | Complaintant states that they are being told to pay for a bill in Gloria McNear's name. Complaintant wants the bill to be sent to the correct person Gloria McNear not sent to him. Complaintant wants the service to be in his name wit hthe bill being made in his name. |
Showing results 10326 - 10350 of 13285
Need More Help?
If you can't find what you're looking for here, please contact the PA Public Utility Commission. Call us at 1-800-692-7380 or contact us online.
Document Search
Public utility documents available electronically include case dockets, public meeting orders and more.
Filing & Resources
Find utility-related reports, laws and regulations, federal filings, tariffs, procedures and more.
eFILING
Consumers, utilities and attorneys can save time by submitting documents to the PUC electronically.
