Utility Code 110550
The Utility Detail View displays the Utility Information (identified by Utility Code - 110550), authorities, and case information associated with that utility.
Basic Utility Information
Utility Name
PECO ENERGY COMPANY-ELECTRIC
Utility Code
110550
Utility Type
Electric
Utility Status
Active
Carrier ID
Utility Contact Information
Physical Address
Mailing Address
2301 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA PA 19101
Phone
Fax
Website
www.exeloncorp.com/
Utility Authorities Information
| Service Type | Authority Status | Date Certified | Suspension Date | Suspension Expiration | Application Number | Trading As Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Distributor | Active |
Utility Insurance Information
No insurance information for this utility.
EGS Territories Serviced by a Utility
Residential
No
Citizens’ Electric
No
Small Commercial
Duquesne Light
No
Mixed Meter
Met-Ed
No
Large Commercial
No
PECO
No
Industrial
No
Penelec
No
Governmental
No
Penn Power
No
Pike
No
PPL
No
UGI Utilities - Electric
No
Wellsboro
No
West Penn Power
No
Docketed Cases
| Docket Number | Case Status | Date Filed | Allegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-2011-2267082 | Closed | 10/3/2011 | Complaintant states that they can not afford the down payment on the agreement. Complaintant states that they want PECO to give a reasonable amount down payment for the agreement, since they ar eon a fixed income. Complaintan tstates tha tthe bill is from a apartment building they use to own in 2003, and that they need help paying the bill. |
| F-2011-2267839 | Closed | 10/17/2011 | Complaintant states that they cancelled electric service and was sent a bill of $896.87 on their next bill due to budget billing balance. Complaintant states that the bill was doublw what she owed. Complaintant states that when researching PECO's website, she found out she only owes $305.56. Complaintant states that she has never paid a budget billing amount. Complaintan twants the budget balnce discrepency resolved by looking at the evidence provided in the complaint. Complaintant also wants budget billing removed fro mher residence. |
| F-2011-2279295 | Closed | 12/7/2011 | Complaintant states that they cannot afford to pay high bill. Complaintant would like the PECO bill to be lowered and to be put on a reasonable payment plan. |
| F-2011-2261537 | Closed | 9/6/2011 | Complaintant states that they created a account with PECO under her name in 2006. Complaintant states that her electric account was not mentioned in the PUC investigation report. Complaintant converted her property into two apartments with seperate electricity accounts. Complaintant states that electricity on the one account was shut off, and she asked her tenants to call PECO for electricity in their name. Complaintant states that the meters were mixed up at PECO's office. Complaintant states that they did not make the mistake and should not have to pay for it. |
| C-2011-2272176 | Closed | 10/31/2011 | Complaintant states that they do not make the income to afford how high they owe on their bill. Complaintant states that ever since PECO placed a meter read, their bill has been getting higher. Complaintant would like lower bills to pay. |
| C-2011-2280374 | Closed | 12/21/2011 | Complaintant states that they do not owe $578.26. Complaintant states that they went from a bill of $111.81 to a bill of $578.26, and no representatives have been able to say why the increase was made to the bill. Complaintant states tha twhen they talked to Harry Smith that the bill should only be $200 plus extra amount. Complaintant states that they have been current with their bill for 20 years, and previously have gone off the budget without the problems occuring now. Complaintan tis worried if they do not get this straightened out, that their bill could end up becoming more of a problem. Complaintant also wants to know if they got double billed by North American and PECO |
| C-2011-2266968 | Closed | 10/3/2011 | Complaintant states that they feel discrimianted against for going total electric. Complaintant states that they are having their rate adjustment taken from them by the PUC. Complaintant wants the PUC to reverse their mandate that PECO stops using the RH rate, because complaintant would like to be able to compare other companies rates. |
| F-2011-2279510 | Closed | 12/12/2011 | Complaintant states that they had a payment agreement with PECO, but they cancelled the agreement making the amount due immediately. Complaintant receive a bill for $888.86. Complaintant would like an explanation for the charges including waiving the late charges payment program. |
| C-2011-2270093 | Closed | 10/21/2011 | Complaintant states that they had service shut off as an error. Complaintant states that the company had no record of complaintant calling and telling them that they would pay on Friday. Complaintant states that this happened in June. Complaintant states that a manager said that it would cost $525 for return of their service. Complaintant states that they were told after paying that service would return in 2-3 days. Complaintant states the managertold them that if their 81 year old mother had no health issues that return service was not a priority. Complaintant would like the supervisor reprimanded for unprofessional conduct, their deposit accredited back to their account, and for someone to look at their account, complaintant states that they do not owe thousands of dollars. |
| F-2011-2273332 | Closed | 11/14/2011 | Complaintant states that they have had high electric bills, even after cutting down on the amount of electricity they use. Complaintant wants to know what is wrong with the bills. Complaintant would also like a reasonable payment arrangement, |
| C-2011-2267111 | Closed | 10/3/2011 | Complaintant states that they have received a termination notice, and would like a paymnet agreement plan.Complaintant want to have a payment arrangement, as they are disabled and their income has changed. |
| C-2011-2264877 | Closed | 9/16/2011 | Complaintant states that they have tried to reach a payment agreement after breaking other payment agreements due to income being paycheck to paycheck. Complaintant states that they had a hearing but could no tmake it due to work schedule and tried to reschedule with no reply. Complaintant states that they just started working again and would like to start with a affordable payment arrangement. Complaintant would like to make a arrangment with PECO for monthly payment of current usage plus $125 toward back debt. |
| C-2012-2281636 | Closed | 12/28/2011 | Complaintant states that they moved in with hermother when their housewas foreclosed in 2008. Complaintant states that they thought everything with Pennsylvania ElectricIs in good standing until she was ready to begin service again. Complaintant states that they got a new home with the bill in her son's name, but when he went to jail she found out hat there was a balance of over $8000 owed.Complaintant states that they would like a reasonable payment agreement, because they cannot afford to pay all that money at once. |
| C-2012-2315314 | Closed | 7/6/2012 | Complaintant States that they need help with a payment arrangement. |
| C-2011-2279466 | Closed | 12/12/2011 | Complaintant states that they recieve 70% discount off Peak service, but the service will soon be eliminated. Complaintant states that the increase in their bill is to much for them to afford. Complaintant has bouth a new electric water tank, but with a fixed income cannot afford the $80 more per bill. Complaintant wants the off peak electric discount reinstated. Complaintant wants PECO to reimburse thse cost of their electric water tank if they need to convert to gas. |
| C-2011-2260474 | Closed | 8/30/2011 | Complaintant states that they recieved a shut off notic eif the amount of $682.35 was not paid. Complaintant states that the amoun tis for revenue protection charge, which has never been explained to the complaintant. Complaintant has paid in full all electric and gas bills as of August 4, 2011.Complaintant states that there is alate charge of $10.22 for the revenue protection charge, which is not a service, therefore violating the law. Complaintant wants the revenue protection charge explained as its importance, and billed seperately from the normal service bill for gas and electric.Complaintant also wants all questons asked through customer service answered and all cost that come from the complaint including attorney fees paid. |
| F-2011-2273556 | Closed | 11/16/2011 | Complaintant states that they re-purchased their house on November 24, 2009 when electric service was restored to property. Complaintant states that they found out outstanding bill of $24,000 for Agnes Farrell, who is the complaintant's deceased Grandmother. In the Spring of 2011, complaintant's power was shut off. Complaintant states that their power was restored May 2nd, 2011. Complaintant states that bills continuedbeing mailed in their Grandmother's name. Complaintant states that they have paid their bill, but not the past amount of $24,000. Complaintant states that they had damaged lines causing power to be out, and were told that property owner was responsible for maintenance to breaker box, meter box, and power lines on side of home. Complaintant called electrician and power restored. Complaintant states that PECO disconnected service, although a theft of ID was in process. Complaintant states that PECO told them power could be restored due to dispute. Complaintant states tha tnumerous other times power has been disconnected and restored, Complaintant states that her bill is $33,358.00 as of October 7,2011. Complaintant wants to have electrical service back and for PECO to correct the bill. |
| C-2012-2298879 | Closed | 4/9/2012 | Complaintant states that they requested payment agreement.Complainant wants to make payment arrangements with an arrear payment of $75. |
| C-2011-2270181 | Closed | 10/18/2011 | Complaintant states that they switched electric bill to their name in July 2011. Complaintant states that they owe a large amount on their bill. Complaintant states that PECO wants a large amount of money up front, but the complaintant states they still cannot afford the amount PECO wants up front. Complaintant would like to pay current bill each month plus a additional $50 to the balance is paid. Complaintant states that currently this is all they can afford. |
| C-2012-2281303 | Closed | 12/22/2011 | Complaintant states that they tried to have electric put in their name in November. Complaintant states they were told to pay thier bill in full before switching service in their name. Complaintant states they were told they could not be put on a payment agreement, because they broke a payment agreement promise. Complaintnat states that they could get their service shut off and lose their kids over the situation. Complaintant states that they want to be able to be put on CAP Program or budget and pay an additional amount until balance is paid. |
| C-2011-2272370 | Closed | 11/3/2011 | Complaintant states that they want a payment arrangement. Complaintant wants the issue resolved by going to court, so PECO can arrange a affordable payment arrangement. |
| C-2011-2273015 | Closed | 11/10/2011 | Complaintant states that they want the bill in Milton or Theron Turner's name.Complaintant states that Mr. Turner's ID was stolen for a period of about 10 years. Complaintant states thatthe individual was using Mr Turner's ID when using electric and gas at a residence that Mr. Turner never lived at nor used the electric and gas service. Complaintant wants to get on the CAP Program, since they will be receiving help from LHeap for most of the bill.Complaintant wants the PUC to order that they can get on the CAP Program, so they can live with a reasonable bill. |
| F-2011-2266457 | Closed | 9/30/2011 | Complaintant states that they want the utility bill transfered into their name. Complaintant would like the electric bill transfered into their name or added to the account. Complaintant would like a reasonable monthly paymnet plan |
| F-2011-2240994 | Closed | 5/9/2011 | Complaintant states that they would like a payment agreement. |
| C-2011-2266015 | Closed | 9/26/2011 | Complaintant states thatComplaintnat states that they had a $7000 bill and September 2, 2011 closed cse determination. Complaintant also questioins th eaccuracy of their billing.Complaintant wants a $50 payment agreement plus CAP re-enrollment plan. Complaintant also wants the usage inspected and someone to check the wiring at their box. |
Showing results 10351 - 10375 of 13285
Need More Help?
If you can't find what you're looking for here, please contact the PA Public Utility Commission. Call us at 1-800-692-7380 or contact us online.
Document Search
Public utility documents available electronically include case dockets, public meeting orders and more.
Filing & Resources
Find utility-related reports, laws and regulations, federal filings, tariffs, procedures and more.
eFILING
Consumers, utilities and attorneys can save time by submitting documents to the PUC electronically.
