Utility Code 110550
The Utility Detail View displays the Utility Information (identified by Utility Code - 110550), authorities, and case information associated with that utility.
Basic Utility Information
Utility Name
PECO ENERGY COMPANY-ELECTRIC
Utility Code
110550
Utility Type
Electric
Utility Status
Active
Carrier ID
Utility Contact Information
Physical Address
Mailing Address
2301 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA PA 19101
Phone
Fax
Website
www.exeloncorp.com/
Utility Authorities Information
| Service Type | Authority Status | Date Certified | Suspension Date | Suspension Expiration | Application Number | Trading As Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Distributor | Active |
Utility Insurance Information
No insurance information for this utility.
EGS Territories Serviced by a Utility
Residential
No
Citizens’ Electric
No
Small Commercial
Duquesne Light
No
Mixed Meter
Met-Ed
No
Large Commercial
No
PECO
No
Industrial
No
Penelec
No
Governmental
No
Penn Power
No
Pike
No
PPL
No
UGI Utilities - Electric
No
Wellsboro
No
West Penn Power
No
Docketed Cases
| Docket Number | Case Status | Date Filed | Allegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-00003817 | Closed | 6/28/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES HIS ELECTRIC HAS GONE OUT ABOUT TEN TIMES SINCE LAST AUG. MAYBE ONE OR TWO OF THESE OUTAGES HAVE BEEN STORM RELATED. ABOUT TWO WEEKS AGO, THEY HAD A BROWN OUT WITH AN AVAILABLE LINE VOLTAGE OF 96 VOLTS. HE STATES THIS IS VERY HARD ON APPLIANCES. HE WANTS TO TELL PECO TO FIX THIS SECTOR PROPERLY. ALSO TO TELL PECO THAT A 10% REDUCTION IN POWER IS THE MAX- IMUM MOST APPLIANCES WILL TOLERATE WITHOUT DAMAGE. |
| C-00003818 | Closed | 6/28/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES ON 4/1/00 HIS WAGES WERE REDUCED BY HIS EMPLOYER, QUALITY CARE DIALYSIS, INC. SO THAT HE BRING HOME NET WAGES OF ONLY $1,535 PER MONTH. HE STATES THIS MAKES IT IMPOSSIBLE FOR HIM TO PAY ALL HIS MONTHLY EXPENSES WHILE PAYING $90 PER MONTH TO PECO ENERGY. HE WANTS PECO TO BE INSTRUCTED TO ALLOW HIM TO PAY HIS BUDGET AMOUNT ONLY, WHICH PRESENTLY IS $50 PER MONTH. |
| C-00003819 | Closed | 6/28/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT IS EXCESSIVE FREQUENCY OF ELECTRICAL POWER OUTA- GES AT HOME ADDRESS. THE PROBLEM HAS PERSISTED FOR 29 YEARS THEY HAVE BEEN IN THEIR HOME; IF ANYTHING IT HAS GOTTEN TO BE WORSE. THEY WANT PECO TO HAVE TO INITIATE A PROGRAM TO REDUCE FREQUENCY AND SEVERITY OF POWER INTERRUPTIONS AT THEIR HOME. AND TO SET STANDARDS REQUIRING PECO TO UPGRADE EQUIPMENT TO RE-ROUTE POWER WHEN OUTAGES DO OCCUR AT THEIR HOUSE. |
| C-00003823 | Closed | 6/28/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT IS UNFAIR BUSINESS PRACTICES, RUDE, NON-RESPONS- IVE CUSTOMER SERVICE, INABILITY TO CORRECT PROBLEMS. HE WANTS PECO ENERGY COMPANY TO CORRECT HIS CREDIT REPORT AND TO FINE PECO ENERGY COMPANY. |
| C-00003824 | Closed | 6/27/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES W.P. COOKE, INC. SUFFERED DAMAGES IN THE AMOUNT OF $14,100 AS A DIRECT AND PROXIMATE RESULT OF PECO'S GROSSLY NEGLIGENT CONDUCT WHICH RESULTED IN A COMPLETE SHUTDOWN OF ELECTRICAL SERVICE TO COOKE'S PLACE OF BUSINESS ON 8/26 & 8/27 OF 1999. SUCH CONDUCT IS CLEARLY VIOLATIVE OF PECO'S TARIFF. W.P. COOKE, INC. RESPECTFULLY REQUESTS THAT THE PUC FIND THAT PECO'S CONDUCT IN THIS MATTER WAS VIOLATIVE OF ITS TARIFF AND THE LAWS OF THIS COMM- ONWEALTH. AND THEY WANT THE COMMISSION TO GRANT THEM LEGAL AND EQUITABLE RELIEF AS IT DEEMS APPROPRIATE. |
| C-00003849 | Closed | 6/29/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES POLES ON MCKINLEY ROAD AVERAGE FOUR FEET OFF ROAD - THREE POLES ON HIS AREA ARE 10 TO OVER 16 FEET ON HIS, WHICH MEAN WHEN THEY TRIM TREES. THE TREES THEN ARE FOURTY FEET INTO HIS PROPERTY. HE WANTS PECO TO PUT POLE #6620 BACK DOWN ON THE TOWNSHIP RIGHT OF WAY, ABOUT FOUR FEET FROM ROAD AS IT WAS BEFORE. HE ALSO WANTS PECO TO REPLACE POLE #95922 BEFORE IT CAUSES A PROBLEM TO HIM OR FALLS IN THE ROAD AND KILLS SOMEONE AND TO MOVE IT CLOSER TO THE ROAD WHEN IT IS REPLACED. HE ALSO WANTS PECO TO MOVE POLE #159 CLOSER TO THE ROAD ON THE TOWNSHIP RIGHT OF WAY. |
| C-00003853 | Closed | 6/30/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES PECO MISAPPLIED HIS PAYMENTS, IT TOOK HIM SIX MONTHS TO GET THE MATTER ACKNOWLEDGED. HE INCURRED LATE CHARGES AND RESEARCH CHARGES BECAUSE OF THIS. HE WANTS ALL LATE CHARGES TO BE REVERSED, AND TO REIMBURSE $25 OF THE BACK RESEARCH AND FOR FURTHER $25 FOR ADDITIONAL RESEARCH. |
| C-00003868 | Closed | 7/7/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES ON 9/15/99 SHE WAS CHARGED $2,485.77 FOR ONE MONTH OF USA- GE PLUS $174.01 TAX. SHE CALLED AND QUESTIONED THE CHARGE SHE WAS ADVISED THAT THIS WAS THE READING THEY WERE STICKING BY. THEY CANCELLED THAT CHARGE BUT SHE WAS RECHARGED ON 11/15/99 FOR $2,804.62 PLUS $196.33 TAX. AFTER SHE CALLED AND COMPLAINED TO PUC THEY CAME OUT AND CHANGED THE METERS AND PUT TWO NEW METERS IN. SHE WANTS THE COMMISSION TO REVIEW HER RECORDS THOROUGHLY AND SEE THAT THE CHARGES IN QUESTION ARE IN ERROR AND HAVE PECO ENERGY REMOVE THESE CHARGES. |
| C-00003870 | Closed | 7/7/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES CUTOMERS WITH EXISTING "OFF-PEAK" METERS CONTINUE TO BE CHARGED A MONTHLY FEE TO HAVE POWER SHUT-OFF DURING "PEAK" TIMES (GENERATING REVENUE & SAVINGS FOR PECO) EVEN WHEN THEY CHOOSE AN ALTERNATE ENERGY GENERAT ION SUPPLIER. SHE STATES THEY HAD TO SPEND $125 TO HAVE THEIR POWER RE-WIRED SO THAT THEY WOULDN'T BE CHARGED & INVONVENIENCED FOR NO GAIN UNDER THE EXIS- TING PECO SYSTEM. THEY WANT THE RULES CHANGED RE: OFF-PEAK SERVICE TO REFL- ECT THE IMPACT OF ENERGY CHOICE AND REQUIRE PECO TO REFUND THE FEES TAKEN FROM CUSTOMERS WHO HAVE CHOSEN ALTERNATE SUPPLIERS. |
| C-00003891 | Closed | 7/12/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES MONTHLY BILL FOR NOVEMBER 1999 (28 DAYS CYCLE) WAS LISTED IN THE AMOUNT OF $294.96. HE FEELS THAT THE AMOUNT CHARGED IS TOO HIGH BASED ON THE RESIDENCE, WHICH IS A TWO BEDROOM DWELLING. HE WANTED PECO TO INVESTI GATE BUT HE WAS TOLD THAT THE AMOUNT HE WAS CHARGED WAS DUE TO AN ERROR ON THEIR PART IN READING OF THE METER AND INCLUDED A PERIOD OF A PREVIOUS BILL- ING. |
| C-00003893 | Closed | 7/12/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES PECO OR ITS AFFILIATES SHOWED UP ON HIS PROPERTY AND START ED DIGGING. THEY ARE PUTTING GAS LINES IN WITHOUT NOTIFYING US OR WITH ANY PROPER RIGHTS TO DO SO. HE DOESN'T WANT GAS LINES IN FRONT OF HIS HOUSE. IF THEY ARE FORCED TO HAVE THEM, THEY WANT APPROPRIATE REIMBURSEMENT. HE WANTS APPROPRIATE ACTION TAKEN AGAINST PECO ENERGY COMPANY. |
| C-00003900 | Closed | 7/14/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES PECO ACCOUNT # 27-09-47-191424 ON 11/17/99 THEY RECEIVED A BILL FOR ONE OF THEIR STORES IN JUNIATA PLAZA SHOPPES, 4501 CASTOR AVENUE, PHILADEPHIA PA 19124. THE BILL WAS FOR $9,025.72 THE BILL WAS PUT IN TRIAD'S NAME ON 11/5/99. THEY STATE THAT THIS BILL ISN'T THEIR BILL. THEY HAVE REQ- UESTED FROM PECO A BILL FROM 11/5/99, AND THEY HAVE NOT RESPONDED AS OF YET. THEY WANT PECO TO PROVIDE WHO HAD THE ACCOUNT BEFORE 11/5/99, ALSO THEY WILL NOT PAY BILL SINCE IT WASN'T PUT IN THEIR NAME UNTIL 11/5/99. |
| C-00003902 | Closed | 7/14/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES THEY PREVIOUSLY LEASED THE FACILITY AT 550 TOWNSHIP LINE ROAD IN BLUE BELL, PA FROM TOMPKINS RUBBER. THEY HAD PURCHASED SOME OF THEIR ASSETS AND OPERATED A PORTION OF THE BUILDING WHILE THE BUSINESS WAS BEING TRANSFERRED TO SOUTH PLANSFIELD, NJ. PECO CHARGED THEM OUTRAGEOUS SUMS BASED ON USAGE OF TOMPKINS WHO HAD PREVIOUSLY RUN THE PLACE. THEY BILLED THEM TWO TO THREE TIMES THEIR ACTUAL USAGE. THEY WANT PECO REQUIRED TO ADJUST ALL OF THEIR BILLS DURING THE PERIOD OF THE LEASE, SO THAT THEY ARE CHARGED ONLY FOR ACTUAL USAGE. |
| C-00003915 | Closed | 7/17/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES HER INITIAL PROBLEM WITH HER BILL FOR PECO HAS BEEN SEMI RESOLVED. HER HUSBAND AND HER DETERMINED THAT AN INCORRECT METER READING, COMPOUNDED BY ESTIMATED BILLS FOR FIVE MONTHS, CAUSED THE HUGE BILL IN AUGUST 1999. SINCE THAT TIME SHE HAS BEEN INSISTING ON AN ACTUAL METER READING EACH MONTH. HER FIRST PROBLEM HAS TO DO WITH GETTING AN ACTUAL READING, HER HUSB- AND AND HER WORK OUTSIDE THE HOME AND ARE NEVER HOME WHEN THE METER READER COMES. THEY NEED SOMEONE TO COME AFTER 5 P.M. THE SECOND PROBLEM HAS TO DO WITH THE ESTIMATED BILLS. SHE IS ALSO COMPLAINING ABOUT A UTILITY POLE IN FRONT OF HER PROPERTY. SHE STATES THAT PECO IS DIFFICULT TO DEAL WITH AT BEST. SHE WANTS HELP IN THESE SITUATIONS. |
| C-00003927 | Closed | 7/19/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES PECO ENERGY COMPANY WANTS HIM TO PAY $1,200 AT ONCE, HE DOESN'T HAVE THAT MUCH MONEY AT ONCE. HE STATES HE JUST STARTED WORKING IN JANUARY AND HE MAKES $7.00 PER HOUR, HIS WIFE JILL WAS TRYING TO KEEP THE BILLS GOING HER SSI WAS CUT OFF APRIL 1ST. HE WOULD LIKE AN AGREEMENT THAT THEY CAN PAY BECAUSE THEY CAN'T PAY $1,200. THEY DO WANT TO PAY THEIR BILL AND GET IT DOWN. |
| C-00003936 | Closed | 7/20/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES HE ALREADY PAY $167 PER MONTH (HIGHEST ON BUDGET ACCOUNT) HE IS NOT ABLE TO PAY $200 A MONTH, HE FEELS THAT THE BILL SHOULD BE LOWERED. HE WANTS THE PUC TO CONTACT PECO OR TO GIVE HIM A BREAK FOR A MOMENT WITH THE HIGH PAYMENTS. |
| C-00003937 | Closed | 7/20/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES HIS COMPLAINT IS THE REFUSAL OF PECO TO CREDIT ACCOUNT WITH $1,640.00 IN HOLD BACK MONIES WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN CREDITED BACK TO CUSTOMER'S ACCOUNT IN MAY OF 2000. THEY WANT TO BE PROVIDED WITH AN EXPLANA- TION OF WHY THE HOLD BACK MONIES HAVE NOT BEEN CREDITED BACK TO THE CUSTOMERS ACCOUNT AS THEY HAD PROMISED TO DO BY MAY OF 2000. |
| C-00003941 | Closed | 7/20/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES THEIR HAIR SALON, ALEXANDER & CO. AT 66 E UWCHLAN AVENUE, EXTON, PA 19341 HAD ITS POWER DISCONNECTED WITHOUT WARNING. THEIR PECO BILL WAS MAILED TO THEIR HOME ADDRESS, THEY MOVED IN JANUARY 2000, ALL OF THEIR MAIL WAS FORWARDED TO THEIR NEW ADDRESS BUT FOR SOMEHOW THE PECO BILL WAS NOT FORWARDED. THEY WANT THE DEPOSIT AND RECONNECT FEE REMOVED, THEY STATE THAT THIS WAS AN HONEST MISTAKE, AND THEY FEEL LIKE THEY WERE TREATED LIKE THEY NEVER PAY THEIR BILLS. |
| C-00003948 | Closed | 7/24/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT IS HOUSE IS VACANT, SHE COMES UP FOR METER READ- INGS UPON REQUEST. THE BILL WENT FROM $12.99 TO $250 IN APRIL. PECO PROMIS- ED TO ADJUST IT, THEY GAVE HER A DATE, BUT NO ONE CAME. SHE WANTS TO KNOW WHY THEY ARE CHANGING AMOUNT WHEN NO ONE LIVES THERE. |
| C-00003950 | Closed | 7/24/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES SHEIS UNABLE TO REACH AN AGREEMENT ON $344.17 SAID TO BE OWED TO PECO DURING A TIME PERIOD PERIOR TO SHUT-OFF ONE MONTH AND HALF PRIOR TO SHUT-OFF. SHE WAS TOLD TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE CAP PROGRAM, WHICH ARE REFLECTED IN HER BILL ALONG WITH ANOTHER PREVIOUS AGREEMENT WHICH IS PAY $15 TOWARDS ARREARS PLUS CURRENT BILL. SHE WANTS TO KNOW HOW TO HAVE HER MONEY APPLIED TO HER BILL TO AVOID THIS IN FUTURE. |
| C-00003972 | Closed | 7/25/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES THEIR ELECTRIC SERVICE WAS TERMINATED ON 6/1/00 FOR THEIR BUSINESS WITHOUT IT EVERY RECEIVING NOTICE PRIOR TO THE SHUT-OFF. THE ELECT- RIC COMPANY STATES THAT A NOTICE WAS LEFT WITH A WHITE MALE (25 YEARS OLD) WHO REFUSED TO SIGN. HE STATES THERE IS NO WHITE MAIL IN HIS EMPLOYMENT OF BUSINESS. HE WANTS PECO TO REIMBURSE HIM FOR THE LOST BUSINESS ON THEIR DAY OF THE SHUT-OFF. |
| C-00003984 | Closed | 8/2/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES IN THE EARLY PART OF JANUARY 2000, HE WAS CONTACTED BY MR KLINE OF 40 MARKEL ROAD, FRAZER PA 19320. HE HAD FLICKERING LIGHTS AND WHEN HIS RESISTANCE HEAT CAME ON, PART OF HIS LIGHTS WOULD GO OUT AND HE HAD NO HEAT. HE CALLED PECO AND EXPLAINED THE PROBLEM AND THEY SENT ANOTHER REPRES- ENTATIVE WHO MADE TEMPORARY REPAIRS TO PECO'S CABLE AT THE METER BOARD. HE QUOTED THE CUSTOMER A PRICE OF $450 IF HE HAD TO DO ALL THE WORK. HE WAS TOLD GIVEN $150 TO REPAIR THE METER BOARD. HE STATES PECO'S CABLE SETTLING INTO THE GROUND CREATED THE WHOLE PROBLEM. HIS GOAL IS TO RECOVER HIS CUSTO- MER'S UNNECESSARY $150 EXPENSE. |
| C-00003985 | Closed | 8/3/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT IS THE OVER CHARGING FOR ELECTRIC CHOICE. PECO IS CHARGING $71.37 FOR CHOOSING ANOTHER ELECTRIC SUPPLIER. SHE WANTS THE PUC TO FORCE PECO TO LOWER OUTRAGEOUS CHARGES TO CONSUMERS AND TO GIVE CONSUMERS OPTIONS OTHER THAN PECO FOR SERVICE. |
| C-00003988 | Closed | 8/3/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES ON MARCH BILL FROM PECO SHE STARTED TO RECEIVE DELAYED CHARGES FROM COLUMBIA ENERGY. NO WHERE ON HER BILL DID IT TELL HER WHAT THESE CHARGES WERE FOR OR THE TOTAL OF HOW MUCH THEY THOUGHT THAT SHE OWED. HOW IS SHE SUPPOSE TO KNOW IF THESE AR HER CHARGES AND WHEN THEY WOULD STOP. SHE RECEIVED NO WARNING OR NO EXPLANATION. SHE CALLED BOTH COMPANIES TO GET THE TOTAL OWED AND EXACTLY WHAT MONTHS SHE WAS BEING BILLED FOR AND FROM BOTH SHE GOT TOLD THE OTHER COMPANYHAD THAT INFORMATION AND THAT SHE WOULD HAVE TO CALL THEM. SHE WANTS THE CHARGES TO BE FORGIVEN OR A VERY MINIMAL PAYMENT PLAN. |
| C-00003991 | Closed | 8/4/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES THEY CONTACTED THE PUC, THEY MADE A AGREEMENT TO HAVE THEM PAY $580 BY 8/28/00 THEN $180 PER MONTH ON A BUDGET. THEY CAN AGREE TO THE $180 PER MONTH, HOWEVER THE $580 THEY CAN'T PAY BY THAT TIME. THEY WANT AN AGREEMENT ON THE $580 TO PAY $40 PER MONTH TILL PAID IN ADDITION TO THE $180. |
Showing results 576 - 600 of 13287
Need More Help?
If you can't find what you're looking for here, please contact the PA Public Utility Commission. Call us at 1-800-692-7380 or contact us online.
Document Search
Public utility documents available electronically include case dockets, public meeting orders and more.
Filing & Resources
Find utility-related reports, laws and regulations, federal filings, tariffs, procedures and more.
eFILING
Consumers, utilities and attorneys can save time by submitting documents to the PUC electronically.
