Utility Code 110550
The Utility Detail View displays the Utility Information (identified by Utility Code - 110550), authorities, and case information associated with that utility.
Basic Utility Information
Utility Name
PECO ENERGY COMPANY-ELECTRIC
Utility Code
110550
Utility Type
Electric
Utility Status
Active
Carrier ID
Utility Contact Information
Physical Address
Mailing Address
2301 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA PA 19101
Phone
Fax
Website
www.exeloncorp.com/
Utility Authorities Information
| Service Type | Authority Status | Date Certified | Suspension Date | Suspension Expiration | Application Number | Trading As Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Distributor | Active |
Utility Insurance Information
No insurance information for this utility.
EGS Territories Serviced by a Utility
Residential
No
Citizens’ Electric
No
Small Commercial
Duquesne Light
No
Mixed Meter
Met-Ed
No
Large Commercial
No
PECO
No
Industrial
No
Penelec
No
Governmental
No
Penn Power
No
Pike
No
PPL
No
UGI Utilities - Electric
No
Wellsboro
No
West Penn Power
No
Docketed Cases
| Docket Number | Case Status | Date Filed | Allegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-00004588 | Closed | 12/20/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES HE HAS BEEN TRYING TO RESOLVE HIS PAST DUE BILL WITH PECO. BUT HE DOESN'T RECEIVE THE BILL AT THE PROPER ADDRESS, IT HAS BEEN MAILED TO 823 CARPENTER ST, AN EMPTY BUILDING NEXT DOOR. THE BILL HAS CLIMBED TO A 6,000 PLUS BILL. HE STATES HE NEEDS TO PAY THIS BILL OVER TIME AND NOT ALL AT ONCE. HE WANTS THE PUC TO HAVE PECO SET UP A PAYMENT THAT IS EQUIVENTLY TO HIS BILL AND SET UP A PLAN THAT HE CAN PAY CURRENT BILL PLUS MONEY TOWARDS THE BACK BILL. |
| C-00004602 | Closed | 12/22/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES PECO ENERGY HAS KNOWLEDGE ON TWO OCCASIONS OF A STOPPED METER AT THE CHURCH SITE PRIOR TO ITS ACTUAL REPLACEMENT, BUT FAILED TO CORR- ECT THE PROBLEM, A COMPANY REPRESENTATIVE INFORMED HIM OF THIS FACT. THERE- FORE THEY BELIEVE THAT THE ADJUSTED BILL FOR TWO YEARS OF ELECTRIC USAGE, WHICH IS NOW APPROXIMATELY $3,862.87 IS UNREASONABLE. THEY REQUEST THAT THE PUC ORDER PECO TO PROPORTION THIS ADJUSTED BILL OR IF POSSIBLE ELIMINATE IT ALTOGETHER. |
| C-00004610 | Closed | 12/26/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES HE CALLED THE PUC FOR HELP, THE AMOUNT THEY SAID TO PAY IS TOO HIGH. HIS ACTUAL BILLS ARE ABOUT $26-$28 MONTHLY. HE IS ON A $100 BUDGET AND $75 FOR PAST DUE. HE IS RECENTLY SEPARATED AND PAYING $800 A MON- TH CHILD SUPPORT. HE STATES HE CAN'T AFFORD THE $175 MONTHLY AMOUNT. HE WANTS THE PUC TO TELL PECO THAT HE WILL PAY THE ACTUAL BILL AND $15 MONTHLY ON PAST DUE UNTIL HIS BAANCE IS PAID IN FULL. |
| C-00004622 | Closed | 12/28/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES WHEN HE RECEIVED HIS OCT.-NOV. 1998 PECO SERVICE BILL HE CHECKED TO SEE HOW MUCH IT HAD COME DOWN FROM THE SAME PERIOD IN 1997. INST- EAD OF COMING DOWN, THE BILL WENT UP TO $99.89. HE SENT THEM A CHECK FOR THAT AMOUNT, AND PECO CREDITED HIM FOR $49.89. HE IS APPEALING THE DECISION OF THE PUC. |
| C-00004625 | Closed | 12/26/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES THE COUNCIL HAS MEMBERS THROUGHOUT THE PECO ENERGY SERVICE TERRITORY WHO ARE AFFECTED BY PECO'S PERFORMANCE WITH THIS UNIQUE PILOT PROG- RAM. THE COUNCIL INTERVENED IN THE PECO ENERGY RESTRUCTURING PROCEEDING AS A MEMBER OF THE ENVIRONMENTALISTS PARTY AND PARTICIPATED ACTIVELY IN THE LITIG- ATION AND NEGOTIATIONS WHICH ENSUED. THE COUNCIL IS TAKEN ACTION BECAUSE THE PECO PLAN CONTAINS NO ON-GRID APPLICATIONS AND DEMONSTRATES NO PREFERENCE FOR ON-GRID APPLICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY COMMISSIONS FINAL ORDER. PECO HAS FAILED TO PROVIDE AN "APPROPRIATE JUSTIFICATION" FOR THE INCLUSION OF OFF-GRID APP- LICATIONS AS REQUIRED BY FINAL ORDER. PECO HAS ATTEMPTED TO MEETS ITS PV COMMITMENTS IN THIS PILOT WITHOUT INSTALLING GRID-TIED PV SYSTEMS. ALSO THE PECO PLAN DOES NOT EMPLOY ANY BI-DIRECTIONAL METERS. PECO HAS ALSO VIOLATED THE COMMISSIONS FINAL ORDER BY PROPOSING TO SPEND, AND/OR ACTUALLY SPENDING $337,240 MORE THAN AUTHORIZED BY THE COMMISSION ON OVERHEAD FOR THE RENEWABLE PILOT. THEY WANT THE COMMISSION TO MAKE PECO RESTORE $750,000 IN PROGRAM COST AND $75,000 IN ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS TO A FULL, TWO-YEAR PHOTOVOLTAIC PROGRAM. |
| C-00014631 | Closed | 1/2/2001 | COMPLAINANT IS A LANDLORD AND STATES THAT HE SHOULD ONLY BE RESPONSIBLE TO PAY HALF OF THE PAST-DUE AMOUNT OF $794.35. COMPLAINANT STATES THAT THE COMPANY ONLY NOTIFIED THE TENANT, NOT THE LANDLORD, ABOUT THE PAST-DUE AMOUNT. |
| C-00014637 | Closed | 1/4/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES HIS FINAL BILL IS NOT CORRECT. HIS ACCOUNT IS FOR A SECOND FLOOR APARTMENT AT 2507 NORTH 28TH STREET, PHILADELPHIA, PA 19132. HE WANTS THE PUC TO ORDER PECO ENERGY COMPANY TO IDENTIFY THE CAUSE OF THIS EXTRA-ORDINARY HIGH FINAL BILL FOR A SECOND FLOOR APARTMENT. |
| C-00014645 | Closed | 1/4/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THEY HAVE A DIRECT INTEREST IN THE RENEWABLE ENERGY PILOT PROGRAM OF PECO ENERGY COMPANY. ECA HAS MEMBERS WHO ARE WITHIN THE CLASS OF CUSTOMERS WHO SHOULD BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE RENEWABLE ENERGY MEASURES. THE ECA HAS MEMBERS THROUGHOUT THE PECO ENERGY SERVICE TERRITORY WHO ARE AFFECTED BY PECO'S PERFORMANCE WITH THIS UNIQUE PILOT PROGRAM. THESE MEMBERS ARE POSITI- ONED TO RECEIVE BENEFITS OR LACK THEREOF FROM THE PILOT. THEY WANT THE COMM- ISSION TO DIRECT PECO TO DELEGATE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE PV PORTION OF THE RENEWABLE ENERGY PILOT PROGRAM TO SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT FUND AND TO PROVIDE THE SDF ACCESS TO KIURP CUSTOMER AND LIURP-ELIGIBLE CUSTOMER DATA IN PECO ENERGY'S POSSESSION. THE COMMISSION SHOULD FURTHER DIRECT PECO ENERGY TO FORWARD TO THE SDF $750,000 IN PROGRAM COSTS AND $75,000 IN ADMINISTRATIVE COSTS FOR THE PHOTOVOLTAIC PROGRAM. |
| C-00014651 | Closed | 1/9/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT IS THAT PECO CONTACTED AN OUTSIDE CONTRACTOR TO REPLACE AND INSTALL NEW BRACKETS THAT SUPPORT THREE ELECTRICAL POWER CABLES BEFORE A BRANCHING CABLE IS ATTACHED THAT SUPPLY THE INDIVIDUAL HOMES. THE ORIGINAL BRACKET(S) WERE ANCHORED TO THE BRICKS AT THE REAR OF THE HOUSE. HOWEVER IN ORDER TO REMOVE THE ORIGINAL BRACKET(S) FROM THE HOUSES, THE CONT- RACTOR WOULD HAVE HAD TO CUT THE BOLTS SECURING THE BRACKET(S). INSTEAD, THEY CHOSE TO DEFACE AND CAUSED DAMAGE TO THE PROPERTY(IES) BY REMOVING THE BRICKS THAT HAD SECURED THE BRACKETS FOR MANY YEARS. HE STATES THIS IS IRRE- SPONSIBLE, UNSAFE AND UNSOUND TO MOUNT THE BRACKET TO THE BARGE BOARD WHICH IS WOOD AND IS PART OF THE ROOFING SYSTEM OF THE HOUSE. |
| C-00014726 | Closed | 1/19/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT IS THAT SHE BELIEVES THAT PECO DIDN'T INCLUDE MEDICAL COVERAGE AND STUDENT LOANS THAT WERE ADDED OVER THE LAST TWO MONTHS. SHE WOULD LIKE FOR PAYMENT OF PAST DUE BE AN AMOUNT SHE CAN KEEP UP WITH $10 OR $50 TO PAST DUE AMOUNT. |
| C-00014735 | Closed | 1/18/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES PECO ENERGY COMPANY THREATENED TO TURN OFF ELECTRIC POWER DURING NORMAL HOURS OF BUSINESS INCLUDING DOCTOR'S OFFICE. THEY MISSED ONE MONTHS PAYMENT ON THIS ACCOUNT. THE ACCOUNT IS OVER 25 YEARS OLD AND IS CURRENT. HE STATES NO FORMAL WARNING WAS GIVEN, EVEN THOUGH PECO CLAIMS IT WAS. HE WANTS THE PUC TO MAKE PECO ISSUE A FORMAL APOLOGY TO THEIR STAFF INCLUDING DOCTORS STAFF AND AN ALLOWANCE ON THEIR FUTURE ELECTRIC BILLS. |
| C-00014739 | Closed | 1/22/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT IS THAT SHE CALLED AND ASK PECO TO TURN OFF HER SERVICE AND THEY DIDN'T TURN IT OFF ON 10/10/99. SHE WANTS THE PUC TO REMOVE THE BILL. |
| C-00014747 | Closed | 1/22/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THEY RECEIVED TWO LETTERS FROM PECO ENERGY COMPANY DATED 11/22/00 - REGARDING ACCT. # 50-10-13-782039 AND ACCT. #50-10-13-781536. A CHECK OF THE ELECTRIC SERVICE HOOKUPS INDICATED THAT THE METERS WERE NOT REGISTERING ALL THE ELECTRICITY BEING USED. THE REQUEST THAT PECO FIGURES BE DRASTICALLY REDUCED TO REFLECT A MORE ACCURATE ESTIMATE OF SERVICE RECEIVED. |
| C-00014755 | Closed | 1/24/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES SHE RECEIVED A REQUEST TO FILL OUT AND RETURN A FORM TO CHOOSE AGAIN ON ELECTRIC PROVIDER. SHE STATES SHE MADE HER SELECTION SEVER- AL MONTHS AGO AND SHE CHOSE PECO. SHE STATES THAT IF SHE WOULD OF WANTED AN ALTERNATE ELECTRIC COMPANY SHE WOULD HAVE DONE SO. SHE FEELS THAT THE LACK OF EDUCATION AS A RESULT OF THIS DEREGULATION ONLY PERPETUATES THIS SITUAT- ION. |
| C-00014764 | Closed | 1/23/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT IS THAT PECO ENERGY COMPANY SHUT OFF HER ELECTR- ICITY WITHOUT PROPER NOTIFICATION. SHE WANTS THE PUC TO HELP HER IN GETTING A REFUND OF THE $60 DEPOSIT AND THE $60 TURN ON FEE. |
| C-00014776 | Closed | 1/29/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPANY CHARGES FEES TO CHANGE NAME ON BILL. SHE STATES SHE RECENTLY DIVORCED AND HAS BEEN TOLD THAT ALTHOUGH SHE LIVED THERE FOR TWENTY YEARS. SHE PAID TO HAVE HER EX-HUSBAND'S NAME TAKEN OFF THE BILL. |
| C-00014779 | Closed | 1/26/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES HIS BILLABLE MONTHLY USAGE IS BEING INCREASED BY 14% IS HIS COMPLAINT. PECO STATES THAT HIS GAS METER CANNOT ACCURATELY MEASURE HIS TRUE USAGE. HE WANTS THE PUC TO HAVE PECO INSTALL A GAS METER THAT GIVES ACCURATE MEASURES. |
| C-00014781 | Closed | 1/31/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THEIR PECO BILL THIS MONTH WENT UP 30 - 40%. THEIR SOCIAL SECURITY COST-OF-LIVING INCREASE WAS 3.5%. AND THEIR RETIREMENT BENEFIT HAS NOT RECEIVED A COST-OF-LIVING INCREASE FOR THREE YEARS. |
| C-00014782 | Closed | 1/31/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT IS THE EXCESSIVE CHARGES FOR NATURAL GAS (HEAT- ING, COOKING, HOT WATER). RATES 25% PLUS OVER PREVIOUS YEAR. FOR PEOPLE WHO ARE ON A RELATIVELY FIXED INCOME, THIS INCREASE IS A GREAT BURDEN. |
| C-00014784 | Closed | 1/29/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT IS THE INCREASE OF $.1 CENT TO RECOVER COST ASSOCIATED WITH GAS CUSTOMER CHOICE PROGRAM. HE WANTS THE PUC TO MAKE PECO HOLD OFF CHARGING UNTIL PROGRAM IS AVAILABLE TO ALL. |
| C-00014789 | Closed | 1/31/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THE BUDGET AMOUNT IS BASED ON ESTIMATED BILLS, NOT ON ACTUAL USAGE. IT IS TOO HIGH, THE AVERAGE BILLS ARE $40/MONTH NOT $70/MONTH. COMPLAINANT STATES THIS NEEDS TO BE FIXED. |
| C-00014817 | Closed | 1/25/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THE MONROE CIRCUIT OF THE PECO ENERGY WHICH SUPPLIES TO HIS COMMUNITY DOES NOT OPERATE WITH IN THE RANGE REQUIRED BY THE STATE AND FEDERAL RULES, NAMELY THE CIRCUIT IS OVERLOADED - RESULTS IN A VARIABLE VOLT- AGE TO HOMES. THE MONROE CIRCUIT IS NOT PROTECTED FOR USUAL NORMAL CONDITIO- NS. THE EQUIPMENT IS OLD, OVERLOADED, ETC. HE WANTS THE PUC TO ENFORCE THE STATE REGULATIONS, REDESIGN THE CIRCUIT, AND COMPANY SHOULD PAY FOR LOSSES DUE TO 6/6/00 ACCIDENT, ETC. |
| C-00014820 | Closed | 1/29/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT IS ABOUT DECISION IN THE MAIL. SHE WAS TOLD THAT SHE DID NOT PAY ACCORDINGLY TO THE DECISION. SHE STATES SHE CAN'T AFFO- RD TO PAY A TOTAL OF $237 A MONTH. SHE WOULD LIKE TO PAY HER BILL. SHE WOULD LIKE TO PAY $15 TOWARDS THE OLD BALANCE UNTIL IT IS PAID IN FULL. |
| C-00014847 | Closed | 2/7/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT IS ABOUT THE BILLS ARE JUST GETTING TOO HIGH. SHE DOESN'T WANT THE PUC TO GIVE THE COMPANIES AN INCREASE WHEN THEY WANT IT. |
| C-00014850 | Closed | 1/26/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES LIKE HUNDREDS OF PECO CUSTOMERS, SHE HAS OP (OFF PEAK) ELECTRIC SERVICE FROM PECO. WHEN SHE CALLED ALTERNATE ELECTRIC SUPPLIERS TO CHECK RATES, THEY INFORMED HER THAT TO SWITCH TO THEIR COMPANY (INCLUDING NEWPOWER) HER OP RATE ALONG WITH HER RATE R WOULD BECOME THEIR RATE R, WHICH IS MUCH HIGHER THAN HER PECO RATE. THEY WOULD NOT JUST SWITCH HER RATE R AND LEAVE HER OP WITH PECO. SHE STATES SHE DOESN'T FEEL THAT IT IS IN THE INTEREST OF OP CUSTOMERS TO BE AUTOMATICALLY SWITCHED, SHE ALSO SAYS IT IS FALSE ADVERTISING TO GUARANTEE A 2% REDUCTION IN ELECTRIC COST. |
Showing results 651 - 675 of 13287
Need More Help?
If you can't find what you're looking for here, please contact the PA Public Utility Commission. Call us at 1-800-692-7380 or contact us online.
Document Search
Public utility documents available electronically include case dockets, public meeting orders and more.
Filing & Resources
Find utility-related reports, laws and regulations, federal filings, tariffs, procedures and more.
eFILING
Consumers, utilities and attorneys can save time by submitting documents to the PUC electronically.
