Utility Code 110550
The Utility Detail View displays the Utility Information (identified by Utility Code - 110550), authorities, and case information associated with that utility.
Basic Utility Information
Utility Name
PECO ENERGY COMPANY-ELECTRIC
Utility Code
110550
Utility Type
Electric
Utility Status
Active
Carrier ID
Utility Contact Information
Physical Address
Mailing Address
2301 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA PA 19101
Phone
Fax
Website
www.exeloncorp.com/
Utility Authorities Information
| Service Type | Authority Status | Date Certified | Suspension Date | Suspension Expiration | Application Number | Trading As Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Distributor | Active |
Utility Insurance Information
No insurance information for this utility.
EGS Territories Serviced by a Utility
Residential
No
Citizens’ Electric
No
Small Commercial
Duquesne Light
No
Mixed Meter
Met-Ed
No
Large Commercial
No
PECO
No
Industrial
No
Penelec
No
Governmental
No
Penn Power
No
Pike
No
PPL
No
UGI Utilities - Electric
No
Wellsboro
No
West Penn Power
No
Docketed Cases
| Docket Number | Case Status | Date Filed | Allegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-00003900 | Closed | 7/14/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES PECO ACCOUNT # 27-09-47-191424 ON 11/17/99 THEY RECEIVED A BILL FOR ONE OF THEIR STORES IN JUNIATA PLAZA SHOPPES, 4501 CASTOR AVENUE, PHILADEPHIA PA 19124. THE BILL WAS FOR $9,025.72 THE BILL WAS PUT IN TRIAD'S NAME ON 11/5/99. THEY STATE THAT THIS BILL ISN'T THEIR BILL. THEY HAVE REQ- UESTED FROM PECO A BILL FROM 11/5/99, AND THEY HAVE NOT RESPONDED AS OF YET. THEY WANT PECO TO PROVIDE WHO HAD THE ACCOUNT BEFORE 11/5/99, ALSO THEY WILL NOT PAY BILL SINCE IT WASN'T PUT IN THEIR NAME UNTIL 11/5/99. |
| C-00003902 | Closed | 7/14/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES THEY PREVIOUSLY LEASED THE FACILITY AT 550 TOWNSHIP LINE ROAD IN BLUE BELL, PA FROM TOMPKINS RUBBER. THEY HAD PURCHASED SOME OF THEIR ASSETS AND OPERATED A PORTION OF THE BUILDING WHILE THE BUSINESS WAS BEING TRANSFERRED TO SOUTH PLANSFIELD, NJ. PECO CHARGED THEM OUTRAGEOUS SUMS BASED ON USAGE OF TOMPKINS WHO HAD PREVIOUSLY RUN THE PLACE. THEY BILLED THEM TWO TO THREE TIMES THEIR ACTUAL USAGE. THEY WANT PECO REQUIRED TO ADJUST ALL OF THEIR BILLS DURING THE PERIOD OF THE LEASE, SO THAT THEY ARE CHARGED ONLY FOR ACTUAL USAGE. |
| U-00004522 | Closed | 7/14/2000 | AGREEMENT DATED JULY 6, 2000, BETWEEN PECO ENERGY COMPANY AND SPRINGFIELD TOWNSHIP, RELATIVE TO AN AGREEMENT OF SALE FOR A PARCEL OF GROUND SITUATE IN WHITEMARSH TOWNSHIP, MONTGOMERY COUNTY, PENNSYLVANIA. |
| Z-00654417 | Closed | 7/17/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES THE AMOUNT OF HER BILLS DURING THE SUMMER MONTHS AND THE MANNER IN WHICH HER COMPLAINT WAS HANDLED IS HER COMPLAINT. SHE STATES IT TOOK ONE YEAR FOR A RESPONSE FROM THE COMMISSION THAT SAID NOTHING. SHE WANTS A MEETING TO BE SET UP WITH HERSELF AND A REPRESENTATIVE FROM OUR AGEN- CY. |
| Z-00770596 | Closed | 7/17/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES PAYMENT WAS MADE IN OFFICE ON MARKET STREET ON 4/24/00, AT APPROXIMATELY 6:30 A.M. IT WAS GIVEN TO GUARD. PECO SHUT OFF HER ELECTRIC ON 4/26/00 IN P.M. SHE STATES PECO DIDN'T LOCATE PAYMENT UNTIL APPROXIMATELY THREE WEEKS LATER. SHE STATES HER NORMAL BILL FOR THE PAST TWO YEARS WAS NEVER OVER 450KW/MONTH. SHE WANTS AN EXPLANATION AS TO JUST WHAT PUC INVEST- IGATED AS FOR HER MONTHLY BUDGET. AND SHE WANTS PECO TO FULLY EXPLAIN KW DIFFERENCE IN BILLING OR TO CANCEL THAT OUTRAGEOUS AMOUNT OF KWH. |
| C-00003915 | Closed | 7/17/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES HER INITIAL PROBLEM WITH HER BILL FOR PECO HAS BEEN SEMI RESOLVED. HER HUSBAND AND HER DETERMINED THAT AN INCORRECT METER READING, COMPOUNDED BY ESTIMATED BILLS FOR FIVE MONTHS, CAUSED THE HUGE BILL IN AUGUST 1999. SINCE THAT TIME SHE HAS BEEN INSISTING ON AN ACTUAL METER READING EACH MONTH. HER FIRST PROBLEM HAS TO DO WITH GETTING AN ACTUAL READING, HER HUSB- AND AND HER WORK OUTSIDE THE HOME AND ARE NEVER HOME WHEN THE METER READER COMES. THEY NEED SOMEONE TO COME AFTER 5 P.M. THE SECOND PROBLEM HAS TO DO WITH THE ESTIMATED BILLS. SHE IS ALSO COMPLAINING ABOUT A UTILITY POLE IN FRONT OF HER PROPERTY. SHE STATES THAT PECO IS DIFFICULT TO DEAL WITH AT BEST. SHE WANTS HELP IN THESE SITUATIONS. |
| Z-00793230 | Closed | 7/18/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES SHE HAS A LARGE OUTSTANDING BILL FROM THE APARTMENTS SHE USED TO LIVE IN. SHE STATES SHE HAD A HARD TIME PAYING THIS BILL OVER THE YEARS. SHE STARTED OUT ON PUBLIC ASSISTANCE SHE NO LONGER GETS CASH ASSIS- TANCE. SHE STATES SHE HAS NEVER HAD ANY AGREEMENTS WITH PECO ENERGY COMPANY. SHE STATES SHE NEEDS TO BE PUT ON A BUDGET MONTHLY (WEEKLY) THAT SHE CAN AFFORD. SHE CAN'T AFFORD $380 LUMP SUM OR TO LOSS HER ELECTRICITY. |
| C-00003927 | Closed | 7/19/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES PECO ENERGY COMPANY WANTS HIM TO PAY $1,200 AT ONCE, HE DOESN'T HAVE THAT MUCH MONEY AT ONCE. HE STATES HE JUST STARTED WORKING IN JANUARY AND HE MAKES $7.00 PER HOUR, HIS WIFE JILL WAS TRYING TO KEEP THE BILLS GOING HER SSI WAS CUT OFF APRIL 1ST. HE WOULD LIKE AN AGREEMENT THAT THEY CAN PAY BECAUSE THEY CAN'T PAY $1,200. THEY DO WANT TO PAY THEIR BILL AND GET IT DOWN. |
| C-00003941 | Closed | 7/20/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES THEIR HAIR SALON, ALEXANDER & CO. AT 66 E UWCHLAN AVENUE, EXTON, PA 19341 HAD ITS POWER DISCONNECTED WITHOUT WARNING. THEIR PECO BILL WAS MAILED TO THEIR HOME ADDRESS, THEY MOVED IN JANUARY 2000, ALL OF THEIR MAIL WAS FORWARDED TO THEIR NEW ADDRESS BUT FOR SOMEHOW THE PECO BILL WAS NOT FORWARDED. THEY WANT THE DEPOSIT AND RECONNECT FEE REMOVED, THEY STATE THAT THIS WAS AN HONEST MISTAKE, AND THEY FEEL LIKE THEY WERE TREATED LIKE THEY NEVER PAY THEIR BILLS. |
| C-00003936 | Closed | 7/20/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES HE ALREADY PAY $167 PER MONTH (HIGHEST ON BUDGET ACCOUNT) HE IS NOT ABLE TO PAY $200 A MONTH, HE FEELS THAT THE BILL SHOULD BE LOWERED. HE WANTS THE PUC TO CONTACT PECO OR TO GIVE HIM A BREAK FOR A MOMENT WITH THE HIGH PAYMENTS. |
| C-00003937 | Closed | 7/20/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES HIS COMPLAINT IS THE REFUSAL OF PECO TO CREDIT ACCOUNT WITH $1,640.00 IN HOLD BACK MONIES WHICH SHOULD HAVE BEEN CREDITED BACK TO CUSTOMER'S ACCOUNT IN MAY OF 2000. THEY WANT TO BE PROVIDED WITH AN EXPLANA- TION OF WHY THE HOLD BACK MONIES HAVE NOT BEEN CREDITED BACK TO THE CUSTOMERS ACCOUNT AS THEY HAD PROMISED TO DO BY MAY OF 2000. |
| F-00726833 | Closed | 7/24/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES IN MONTH OF JULY 1999, SHE REQUESTED THE TERMINATION OF HER ELECTRICITY, SERVICED BY PECO ENERGY AT THE RESIDENCE OF 314 NORTH 32ND ST, APT 1 F PHILADELPHIA, PA 10104. AS PER PECO'S REQUIREMENT SHE SET AN APPOINTMENT WITH A SERVICE PERSON TO COME TO THE RESIDENTS AND TERMINATE THE SERVICE. AFTER SHE RECEIVED A NEW BILL, SHE INQUIRED TO PECO ABOUT THE BILL. SHE WAS TOLD THEY WOULD LOOK INTO MATTER, BUT SHE KEPT ON GETTING BILLED. SHE WANTS THE PUC TO CLEAR THE BALANCE OF $124.49 THAT PECO ENERGY HOLDS IN HER NAME FOR THE ADDRESS OF 314 NORTH 32ND ST APT 1 F. |
| C-00003950 | Closed | 7/24/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES SHEIS UNABLE TO REACH AN AGREEMENT ON $344.17 SAID TO BE OWED TO PECO DURING A TIME PERIOD PERIOR TO SHUT-OFF ONE MONTH AND HALF PRIOR TO SHUT-OFF. SHE WAS TOLD TO BE ELIGIBLE FOR THE CAP PROGRAM, WHICH ARE REFLECTED IN HER BILL ALONG WITH ANOTHER PREVIOUS AGREEMENT WHICH IS PAY $15 TOWARDS ARREARS PLUS CURRENT BILL. SHE WANTS TO KNOW HOW TO HAVE HER MONEY APPLIED TO HER BILL TO AVOID THIS IN FUTURE. |
| C-00003948 | Closed | 7/24/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT IS HOUSE IS VACANT, SHE COMES UP FOR METER READ- INGS UPON REQUEST. THE BILL WENT FROM $12.99 TO $250 IN APRIL. PECO PROMIS- ED TO ADJUST IT, THEY GAVE HER A DATE, BUT NO ONE CAME. SHE WANTS TO KNOW WHY THEY ARE CHANGING AMOUNT WHEN NO ONE LIVES THERE. |
| C-00003972 | Closed | 7/25/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES THEIR ELECTRIC SERVICE WAS TERMINATED ON 6/1/00 FOR THEIR BUSINESS WITHOUT IT EVERY RECEIVING NOTICE PRIOR TO THE SHUT-OFF. THE ELECT- RIC COMPANY STATES THAT A NOTICE WAS LEFT WITH A WHITE MALE (25 YEARS OLD) WHO REFUSED TO SIGN. HE STATES THERE IS NO WHITE MAIL IN HIS EMPLOYMENT OF BUSINESS. HE WANTS PECO TO REIMBURSE HIM FOR THE LOST BUSINESS ON THEIR DAY OF THE SHUT-OFF. |
| R-00005603 | Closed | 7/26/2000 | PECO ENERGY FILED REVISED PAGES TO SUPPLEMENT NO 10 TO PA PUC NO 3. THE PUR- POSE OF THIS FILING IS TO CLARIFY CERTAIN RULES CONCERNING THE ONE-TIME WAIVER OF DEMAND MINIMUM CHARGES WHEN A CUSTOMER USES PLR SERVICE IN THE SUMMER AND THEN SHOPS WITH AN EGS IN THE WINTER, IT ALSO CONTAINS OTHER TARIFF HOUSEKEEPING REVISIONS. |
| F-00768397 | Closed | 7/31/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES HIS BILLS FOR JAN - FEB - MARCH OF 2000 WERE EXCESSIVE HE HAS BEEN LIVING THERE FOR WINTERS OF 1997-1998-1999 & 2000. HIS WIFE AND HIM ARE RETIRED, THEY ARE ONLY TWO PEOPLE LIVING IN THIS HOUSE. HE QUESTIONS WHY SHOULD HIS AVERAGE BILL GO FROM $200 - $225 TO OVER $600. PECO WROTE THAT HE HAS A SUMP PUMP AND HE DOES NOT AND NEVER OWNED A SUMP PUMP. HE FEELS THAT THE EXCESSIVE CHARGES SHOULD BE REDUCED BY 50%. AND HE STATES THAT IF THIS HAPPENS AGAIN HE WILL ASK FOR A NEW METER. |
| Z-00796984 | Closed | 7/31/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES SHE DIDN'T RECEIVE NOTICE THAT HER SERVICE WAS TO BE TER- MINATED. SHE FEELS THAT SHE SHOULD HAVE RECEIVED AT LEAST TWO STRONG NOTICES BEFORE THIS HAPPENED TO HER. SHE OWED ONLY $154 PAST DUE ONE MONTH. SHE SAYS SHE PAID WITHIN ONE HOUR OF TERMINATION BUT PECO WOULD NOT RESTORE HER SERVICE UNTIL NEXT MORNING. SHE WANTS TO APPLY THE SECURITY DEPOSIT, SHE WAS REQUIRED TO PAY TO FUTURE BILLS AND TO CREDIT HER ACCOUNT. SHE ALSO FEELS THAT A NOTICE OF A FLYER ON DOOR OR A STRONG MESSAGE ON ANSWERING MACHINE THAT SERVICE WOULD BE TERMINATED WITHINT 24 OR 48 HOURS. |
| C-00003984 | Closed | 8/2/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES IN THE EARLY PART OF JANUARY 2000, HE WAS CONTACTED BY MR KLINE OF 40 MARKEL ROAD, FRAZER PA 19320. HE HAD FLICKERING LIGHTS AND WHEN HIS RESISTANCE HEAT CAME ON, PART OF HIS LIGHTS WOULD GO OUT AND HE HAD NO HEAT. HE CALLED PECO AND EXPLAINED THE PROBLEM AND THEY SENT ANOTHER REPRES- ENTATIVE WHO MADE TEMPORARY REPAIRS TO PECO'S CABLE AT THE METER BOARD. HE QUOTED THE CUSTOMER A PRICE OF $450 IF HE HAD TO DO ALL THE WORK. HE WAS TOLD GIVEN $150 TO REPAIR THE METER BOARD. HE STATES PECO'S CABLE SETTLING INTO THE GROUND CREATED THE WHOLE PROBLEM. HIS GOAL IS TO RECOVER HIS CUSTO- MER'S UNNECESSARY $150 EXPENSE. |
| C-00003985 | Closed | 8/3/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT IS THE OVER CHARGING FOR ELECTRIC CHOICE. PECO IS CHARGING $71.37 FOR CHOOSING ANOTHER ELECTRIC SUPPLIER. SHE WANTS THE PUC TO FORCE PECO TO LOWER OUTRAGEOUS CHARGES TO CONSUMERS AND TO GIVE CONSUMERS OPTIONS OTHER THAN PECO FOR SERVICE. |
| C-00003988 | Closed | 8/3/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES ON MARCH BILL FROM PECO SHE STARTED TO RECEIVE DELAYED CHARGES FROM COLUMBIA ENERGY. NO WHERE ON HER BILL DID IT TELL HER WHAT THESE CHARGES WERE FOR OR THE TOTAL OF HOW MUCH THEY THOUGHT THAT SHE OWED. HOW IS SHE SUPPOSE TO KNOW IF THESE AR HER CHARGES AND WHEN THEY WOULD STOP. SHE RECEIVED NO WARNING OR NO EXPLANATION. SHE CALLED BOTH COMPANIES TO GET THE TOTAL OWED AND EXACTLY WHAT MONTHS SHE WAS BEING BILLED FOR AND FROM BOTH SHE GOT TOLD THE OTHER COMPANYHAD THAT INFORMATION AND THAT SHE WOULD HAVE TO CALL THEM. SHE WANTS THE CHARGES TO BE FORGIVEN OR A VERY MINIMAL PAYMENT PLAN. |
| C-00003992 | Closed | 8/4/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT IS HIS COMMUNITY EXPERIENCED A NORMAL POWER FAILURE ON 7/3/00. THE POWER WAS RESTORED WITH A SURGE & REMAINED ON. THE SURGE TRIPPED BREAKERS & CAUSED EXTENSIVE DAMAGE TO HOME WIRING AND RESULTED IN AN ELECTRICAL FIRE AT ONE HOME ON 7/4/00. IT DAMAGED OR DESTROYED, MICRO- WAVES, TV'S, SATELLITE RECEIVERS, GARAGE DOOR OPENERS, DISHWASHERS, GFI'S, COMPUTERS, FAX & COPY MACHINES, PRINTERS, RANGES, ELECTRONIC SOUND EQUIPMENT, SURGE PROTECTORS, ETC. IT ALSO CAUSED LOSS OF FOOD IN FREEZERS WITH TRIPPED BREAKERS. THEY WANT THE PUC TO REQUIRE PECO TO PUT IN WRITING THEIR VERSION OF WHAT HAPPENED TO THESE CUSTOMERS. REQUIRE PECO TO UPGRADE FACILITIES THAT PROVIDE POWER TO THIS COMMUNITY & TO INSTALL SOME TYPE OF ELECTRICAL DEVICE TO PREVENT MASSIVE POWER SURGES TO THIS COMMUNITY. ALSO SUGGEST TO PECO THAT AS A MINIMUM IT SHOULD CONSIDER COMPENSATING THESE CUSTOMERS FOR THE AMOUNT OF THE DEDUCTIBLE ON THEIR INSURANCE COVERAGE. |
| C-00003991 | Closed | 8/4/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES THEY CONTACTED THE PUC, THEY MADE A AGREEMENT TO HAVE THEM PAY $580 BY 8/28/00 THEN $180 PER MONTH ON A BUDGET. THEY CAN AGREE TO THE $180 PER MONTH, HOWEVER THE $580 THEY CAN'T PAY BY THAT TIME. THEY WANT AN AGREEMENT ON THE $580 TO PAY $40 PER MONTH TILL PAID IN ADDITION TO THE $180. |
| C-00003999 | Closed | 8/7/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES PECO HAS SUBCONTRACTED COLLECTIONS TO COMPANIES AS FAR AWAY AS KEY WEST, FLORIDA AND AS NEAR AS FORT WASHINGTON, PA AND THAT IS THEIR BUSINESS. THE PROBLEM THEY CAUSE IN DOING THIS IS THAT THE INFORMATION PROVIDED MOST OF THE TIME IS OUT DATED. AS THIS MATTER APPLIES TO MOSER KNAUSER ASSOCIATES, THEY PAY ALL BILLS MONTHLY AND HAVE BEEN AS CUSTOMER OF PECO FOR 30 YEARS AT THE SAME ADDRESS. IF POSSIBLE THEY WANT THE PUC TO ADVISE PECO THAT THEIR BILLINGS SHOULD BE CORRECT, THEY PUT THEIR CUSTOMERS TO A LOT OF TROUBLE GOING BACK THROUGH HISTORIC FILES ONLY TO FIND THAT PECO CLAIM A THIRD PARTY COLLECTOR WAS PAID. |
| C-00004003 | Closed | 8/7/2000 | COMPLAINANT STATES FOR TWENTY-TWO YEARS THEIR DEVELOPMENT LOSES ELECTRICTY MANY TIMES DURING THE YEAR. PECO HAS NEVER PROPERLY EXPLAINED THE REASON NOR HAVE THEY PROPERLY CORRECTED THE PROBLEM. ON 7/31/00 AT APPROXIMATELY 6:00 PM THEY LOST POWER THEN AT 7:35 PM ONE HOUR AFTER STORM STOPPED THE ELECTRIC- ITY WENT OFF FOR 2 1/2 HOURS. REPEATED CALLS TO THEIR EMERGENCY NUMBER WERE USELESS BECAUSE THE OPERATORS HAD NO IDEA OF WHAT THE PROBLEM WAS OR WHEN IT WOULD BE CORRECTED. HE WANTS TO KNOW WHY THE PROBLEM HASN'T BEEN CORRECTED. |
Showing results 4476 - 4500 of 13287
Need More Help?
If you can't find what you're looking for here, please contact the PA Public Utility Commission. Call us at 1-800-692-7380 or contact us online.
Document Search
Public utility documents available electronically include case dockets, public meeting orders and more.
Filing & Resources
Find utility-related reports, laws and regulations, federal filings, tariffs, procedures and more.
eFILING
Consumers, utilities and attorneys can save time by submitting documents to the PUC electronically.
