Utility Code 110550
The Utility Detail View displays the Utility Information (identified by Utility Code - 110550), authorities, and case information associated with that utility.
Basic Utility Information
Utility Name
PECO ENERGY COMPANY-ELECTRIC
Utility Code
110550
Utility Type
Electric
Utility Status
Active
Carrier ID
Utility Contact Information
Physical Address
Mailing Address
2301 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA PA 19101
Phone
Fax
Website
www.exeloncorp.com/
Utility Authorities Information
| Service Type | Authority Status | Date Certified | Suspension Date | Suspension Expiration | Application Number | Trading As Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Distributor | Active |
Utility Insurance Information
No insurance information for this utility.
EGS Territories Serviced by a Utility
Residential
No
Citizens’ Electric
No
Small Commercial
Duquesne Light
No
Mixed Meter
Met-Ed
No
Large Commercial
No
PECO
No
Industrial
No
Penelec
No
Governmental
No
Penn Power
No
Pike
No
PPL
No
UGI Utilities - Electric
No
Wellsboro
No
West Penn Power
No
Docketed Cases
| Docket Number | Case Status | Date Filed | Allegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-00864516 | Closed | 8/6/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT PECO WILL NOT TAKE HIS CHECK. HE ASKS: 1. WHY WON'T PECO TAKE HIS CHECK?, 2. WHY DO THEY CHARGE IN WATTS?, 3. HOW ARE THEIR MET- ERS CALIBRATED?, 4. WHY DO THEY SEND PEOPLE TO YOUR HOUSES AND TO WHO ARE THEY?, 5. WHY ARE THEY CHARGING HIM DISTRIBUTION AND TRANSITION CHARGES, AND 6. WHEN WERE THEY SOLD AND TO WHOM?. HE WANTS THE PUC INVESTIGATE HIS COM- PLAINT, STOP AIRING TV COMMERCIALS, AND MAKE PECO CORRECT HIS BILLING PROB- LEMS.------------------------------------------------------------------------- CASE ENTERED IN ERROR - RE-DOCKETED AT Z-00864516. |
| C-20015989 | Closed | 8/7/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT SHE RECEIVED A VERY HIGH ELECTRIC BILL FOR JULY 1998. HER ELECTRICIAN COULDN'T FIND ANYTHING WRONG WITH THE METER, AND SHE INFORMED PECO OF THIS. PECO THEN CHANGED THE METER WITHOUT NOTIFYING HER. WHEN SHE CALLED THE PUC ABOUT THIS, AN EMPLOYEE DESCRIBED HER COMPLAINT AS "BULLSHIT". SHE HAS NOT HAD SUCH A HIGH BILL SINCE, WHILE SHE HASN'T ALTERED HER USAGE. SHE WANTS THE PUC TO MAKE PECO PROCURE HER USAGE RECORDS, MAKE PECO CREDIT HER ACCOUNT FOR THE EXCESS, SANCTION PECO FOR REMOVING THE METER, MAKE THE EMPLOYEE FORMALLY APOLOGIZE, AND RULE THAT PECO DIDN'T PROVIDE CORRECT BILLS. |
| C-20015996 | Closed | 8/8/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT THE METHOD PECO USES TO CALCULATE GAS USAGE, CCF, IS AN ARCHAIC, OBSOLETE, MISUNDERSTOOD UNIT OF MEASURE THAT IS ONLY USED IN 2 COUNTRIES WORLDWIDE. HE STATES THAT INTERNATIONAL STANDARDS CALL FOR THE USE OF THE M3 METHOD, SIMILAR TO THE KWH MEASURE. HE WANTS THE PUC TO ORDER PECO TO CHANGE THEIR METERS FROM THE CCF METHOD TO THE M3 METHOD, OR PROVIDE A CONVERSION SCALE AND BILLINGS WITH METRIC MEASUREMENTS. |
| C-20015990 | Closed | 8/9/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT HIS SERVICE IS SCHEDULED TO BE TERMINATED AUGUST 20. HE WANTS THE PUC TO INVESTIGATE HIS COMPLAINT, AND MAKE PECO STOP THE SERVICE TERMINATION. |
| C-20015994 | Closed | 8/9/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT PECO ARBITRARILY CHANGED THEIR POLICY REGARDING PRE- PAYMENT OF CTC CHARGES. THEY STATE THAT THIS EFFECTIVELY SHUT OFF THOSE WHO WOULD BENEFIT THE MOST FROM CTC PRE-PAYMENT. THEY ALSO CHANGED THE 8.71% DISCOUNT RATE TO 3.93% TO DISCOURAGE CUSTOMERS FROM PRE-PAYING CTC CHARGES. THEY WANT THE PUC TO INVESTIGATE, DEFINE AND RESOLVE THE ELIGIBILITY AND QUALIFICATION ISSUE FOR CUSTOMERS SERVED RATE HT AND ENSURE THAT AN APPROPRI- ATE DISCOUNT RATE IS AVAILABLE TO ENCOURAGE CUSTOMERS TO PARTICIPATE. |
| C-20016029 | Closed | 8/16/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT PECO OVERCHARGED HER SINCE AUGUST 2000. SHE STATES THAT SHE IS STILL RECEIVING BILLS FROM HER PREVIOUS ADDRESSES, AND IS UPSET ABOUT THIS. SHE WANTS THE PUC TO HELP HER FIGURE OUT WHAT SHE ACTUALLY OWES, AND MAKE PGW CREDIT HER ACCOUNT ACCORDINGLY. |
| C-20016049 | Closed | 8/16/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT HER BILLS HAVE BEEN HIGH FOR THE LAST 6 YEARS. SHE STATES THAT PECO TOLD HER SHE WAS NOT ELIGIBLE FOR THE CAP PROGRAM. HER BILL CONTINUED TO GO UP AND PECO GOT SOME ENERGY SAVING THINGS FOR HER APARTMENT. SHE FOUND THAT SHE HAD A FOREIGN LOAD PROBLEM AND PECO CREDITED HER $177.00. SHE STATES THAT HER USAGE HAS GONE UP IN THE LAST YEAR, BUT SINCE HER BILL HASN'T, SHE THINKS THAT THERE MIGHT BE A PROBLEM. SHE WANTS THE PUC TO MAKE PECO FORGIVE PART OF HER BILL IF APPLICABLE. |
| C-20016027 | Closed | 8/16/2001 | COMPLAINANTS STATE THAT THEY BELIEVE PECO HAS BEEN OVERCHARGING THEM AND TAKING INCORRECT METER READINGS SINCE JULY 2000. THEY CONTACTED PECO ABOUT THIS AND FOUND THAT THE QUALITY OF THEIR CUSTOMER SERVICE IS POOR. THEY WANT THE PUC TO MAKE PECO CALIBRATE THEIR METER, AND RAISE THE STANDARDS OF THEIR CUSTOMER SERVICE. |
| Z-00967021 | Closed | 8/17/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT SHE CAN'T AFFORD HER BUDGET PAYMENTS. SHE WANTS THE PUC TO LOWER THEM. |
| Z-00965945 | Closed | 8/17/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT SHE HAS HEALTH PROBLEMS WHICH MAKE HER UTILITIES MEDICALLY NECESSARY. SHE STATES THAT PECO TERMINATED HER SERVICE ALTHOUGH SHE HAD BEEN PAYING HER BILLS ON TIME. SHE WANTS THE PUC TO ENFORCE HER BUDGET AMOUNT OF $15.00, MAKE PECO STOP SHUTTING OFF HER ELECTRICITY, AND MAKE THEM REFUND HER ACCOUNT $135.00 FOR HER 6/13/01 OVERPAYMENT. |
| Z-00959143 | Closed | 8/20/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT HER ELECTRIC SERVICE WAS TERMINATED ON 5/31/01 WITH- OUT PRIOR NOTIFICATION. SHE STATES THAT PECO HAS BEEN UNABLE TO CONFIRM THAT SHE WAS NOTIFIED, AND THEY WANT TO CHARGE HER A $120.00 RECONNECTION FEE. SHE STATES THAT THEY ARE ALSO HOLDING $446.00 AS A SECURITY DEPOSIT. SHE STATES THAT SHE HAS BEEN A GOOD CUSTOMER, AND THAT PECO CASHED HER $250.00 CHECK 2 WEEKS BEFORE THIS. SHE WANTS THE PUC TO MAKE PECO REFUND HER MONEY, WAIVE THE RECONNECTION FEE AND SECURITY DEPOSIT, AND INFORM HER HOW SHE SHOULD BE NOTIFIED OF A SERVICE TERMINATION. |
| Z-00959367 | Closed | 8/20/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT PECO TURNED OFF HIS POWER AFTER THEY STATED THAT A PHONE CALL WAS MADE. HE DID NOT RECEIVE ANY MESSAGES FROM PECO. HE WANTS THE PUC TO SET UP A BUDGET TOTALLING $250.00-$275.00 MONTHLY. |
| F-00905167 | Closed | 8/20/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT HER BILLS FOR 2/01 AND 3/01 WERE TOO HIGH. SHE STATES THAT PECO CAN'T ASSUME THAT SHE HAS HER HEAT ON. SHE STATES THAT SHE DOESN'T DO MUCH COOKING OR USE MUCH HOT WATER. SHE STATES THAT A PECO REP CAME TO READ THE METER, BUT DIDN'T TAKE AN ACCURATE READING. SHE IS UPSET BECAUSE SHE STATES THAT A PUC EMPLOYEE TOLD HER THAT THERE WAS NO USE IN PUR- SUING THE MATTER BECAUSE THE JUDGE USUALLY AGREES WITH PECO. SHE WANTS THE PUC TO MAKE PECO ADJUST HER BILL. |
| C-20016051 | Closed | 8/21/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT EVERY 3 OR 4 MONTHS, HIS BILL DOUBLES. HE STATES THAT HE WANTS PECO TO TAKE AN ACCURATE METER READING. HE STATES THAT HE HAS BEEN TO COURT SEVERAL TIMES ABOUT THIS. HE STATES THAT HE HAS A LETTER FROM PECO'S ATTORNEY ADMITTING THAT THEY OVERCHARGED HIM. HE STATES THAT HE NOW DOESN'T TRUST PECO, AND HIS ATTORNEY INFORMED HIM THAT HIS LETTER IS PRECED- ENCE FOR A CLASS ACTION LAW SUIT AGAINST PECO. HE WANTS THE PUC TO FORCE PECO TO TAKE AN ACCURATE METER READING. |
| C-20016065 | Closed | 8/22/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT HIS METER DID NOT WORK PROPERLY FOR OVER 16 MONTHS. HE STATES THAT HIS CLAIM THAT MORE PEOPLE LIVE THERE WAS TURNED DOWN. HE STATES THAT PECO ADJUSTED HIS CURRENT BILL. HE WANTS THE PUC TO MAKE PECO CREDIT HIS ACCOUNT FOR THE 16 MONTHS WHEN HIS METER WAS NOT WORKING PROPERLY. |
| C-20016057 | Closed | 8/23/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT SHE HAD A BUDGET ARRANGEMENT WITH PECO TO PAY $10.00 ON THE ARREARAGE PLUS THE CURRENT CHARGES. SHE STATES THAT SHE WAS ON THIS FOR YEARS, UNTIL SHE WAS PLACED IN THE CAP PROGRAM. SHE WAS TOLD THAT THE $10.00 WOULD BE INCLUDED IN HER TOTAL BILL. SHE STATES THAT IF YOU ADD THE $10.00 MONTHLY OVER A PERIOD OF YEARS, IT COMES OUT TO MORE THAN THE ORIGINAL BILL. SHE WANTS THE PUC TO MAKE PECO TO HONOR HER ORIGINAL BUDGET PLAN OF $10.00 MONTHLY ON THE ARREARAGE PLUS THE CURRENT CHARGES, AND POSSIBLY FOR- GIVE HER DEBT. |
| Z-00968095 | Closed | 8/27/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES SHE WANTS HER RECONNECTION FEE REFUNDED. SHE HAD FAXED BACK THREE OR FOUR MEDICAL CERTIFICATION FORMS TO PECO, AND SHE GOT CONFIRMA- TION BACK FOR ALL OF THEM. SHE STATES HER ELECTRIC SHOULD HAVE NEVER BEEN SHUT OFF. SHE WANTS THE RECONNECTION FEE REFUNDED OR CREDITED TO HER ACCOUNT SINCE IT WAS THEIR FAULT THAT SHE WAS SHUT OFF. |
| C-20016075 | Closed | 8/27/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES COMPLAINT CONCERNS HER ELECTRIC BILL, SHE FEELS THAT SHE WAS OVERCHARGED FOR HER SERVICES. SHE WOULD APPRECIATE HER BILL TO BE REDU- CED CONSIDERING THE CIRCUMSTANCES. ADDITIONALLY, SHE WANTS TO PAY $50 BUDGET AMOUNT UNTIL HER BALANCE IS PAID IN FULL. SHE WOULD LIKE TO REQUEST A HEARING BE HELD BY PHONE DUE TO THE FACT THAT SHE HAS TWIN BABIES IN WHICH TRAVELING WOULD BE A PROBELM. SHE WANTS A RE-EVALUATION OF HER ACCOUNT & WOULD LIKE HER BILL REDUCED. |
| C-20016084 | Closed | 8/29/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT HE HAS FREQUENT AND PROLONGED POWER OUTAGES. HE STA- TES THAT HE HAS INCURRED MANY LOSSES SUCH AS NEEDLESS ELECTRICAL WORK AND HOTEL AND RESTAURANT BILLS, AND CONTRACTED ILLNESSES BECAUSE OF THIS. PECO DENIES ANY RESPONSIBILITY FOR THIS. HE WANTS THE PUC TO MAKE PECO EXPLAIN WHAT A SUSTAINED OUTAGE IS AND WHAT THEIR STANDARDS FOR SERVICE ARE, PROVIDE INFORMATION OF THE FREQUENCY AND DURATION OF OUTAGES, PROVIDE RECORDS FOR THE LAST 4 YEARS, COMPARE HIS RECORDS WITH HIS NEIGHBORS, AND MAKE PECO TAKE AC- TION TO PREVENT THIS FROM HAPPENING AGAIN. |
| C-20016079 | Closed | 8/29/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT PECO REFUSES TO HELP THEM SET UP AN AFFORDABLE PAY- MENT PLAN. THEY WANT THE PUC TO SET UP A PAYMENT PLAN IN WHICH THEY PAY THEIR CURRENT BILL PLUS $25.00 ON THE ARREARAGE. |
| F-00895063 | Closed | 8/30/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT HIS METER DOESN'T HAVE A SEAL. HE STATES THAT HE HAS NEVER TAMPERED WITH THE METER, AND THAT PECO IS WRONG BY CLAIMING SO. HE STATES THAT HE WORKS VERY HARD AND WOULDN'T HAVE TIME TO DO IT EVEN IF HE WANTED TO. HE STATES THAT HE THINKS THAT PECO SHOULD CONTACT THE PREVIOUS HOME OWNER ABOUT THIS. HE WANTS THE PUC TO INVESTIGATE HIS COMPLAINT. |
| M-FACE0110 | Closed | 8/30/2001 | PECO ENERGY FILED THEIR PRELIMINARY TRANSITION COST RECOVERY RECONCILIATION FOR THE YEAR 2001. |
| C-20016087 | Closed | 8/30/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THEY NEED TO SET UP A PAYMENT ARRANAGEMENT THAT THEY CAN KEEP. IN THE WINTER THEIR BILLS JUMPED UP TO $500 - $600 A MONTH. ON TOP OF THAT THEY WERE TO PAY $100 TOWARDS A PAST DUE BALANCE. THE PAST DUE BALA- NCE CAME ABOUT BECAUSE THEY WERE ON A BUDGET PLAN THE FIRST YEAR THEY BOUGHT THIS HOUSE. THEY JUST COULDN'T PAY $600 - $700 MONTH FOR THEIR PECO BILL. THEY WANT THE PUC TO LET THEM PAY THE NEW BUDGET AMOUNT PLUS $20 A MONTH TOWARDS PAST DUE BALANCE. |
| C-20016102 | Closed | 8/31/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT SHE RECEIVED A BCS LETTER STATING THAT SHE WOULD HAVE TO PAY PECO $788.59. SHE STATES THAT SHE HAD BEEN TOLD MONTHS AGO THAT SHE HAD BEEN TAKEN OFF THE CAP PROGRAM. SHE STATES THAT SHE CALLED PECO AFTER HAVING RECEIVED OUR LETTER, AND THEY TOLD HER THAT SHE WAS OFF THE CAP PRO- GRAM. SHE WANTS THE PUC TO HELP HER PAY HER BILLS. |
| C-20016103 | Closed | 9/4/2001 | COMPLAINANT STATES THAT HIS ELECTRIC BILLS ARE TOO HIGH. HE STATES THAT HE WORKS 2 JOBS, AND HIS HEAT IS ONLY ON FOR 6 HOURS PER NIGHT, SO HIS BILL SHOULD BE LESS. HE WANTS THE PUC TO MAKE PECO USE A LOWER CALCULATION TO ESTIMATE HIS BILLS BECAUSE HE IS NOT HOME AS MUCH AS THE AVERAGE PERSON. |
Showing results 4751 - 4775 of 13287
Need More Help?
If you can't find what you're looking for here, please contact the PA Public Utility Commission. Call us at 1-800-692-7380 or contact us online.
Document Search
Public utility documents available electronically include case dockets, public meeting orders and more.
Filing & Resources
Find utility-related reports, laws and regulations, federal filings, tariffs, procedures and more.
eFILING
Consumers, utilities and attorneys can save time by submitting documents to the PUC electronically.
