Utility Code 110550
The Utility Detail View displays the Utility Information (identified by Utility Code - 110550), authorities, and case information associated with that utility.
Basic Utility Information
Utility Name
PECO ENERGY COMPANY-ELECTRIC
Utility Code
110550
Utility Type
Electric
Utility Status
Active
Carrier ID
Utility Contact Information
Physical Address
Mailing Address
2301 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA PA 19101
Phone
Fax
Website
www.exeloncorp.com/
Utility Authorities Information
| Service Type | Authority Status | Date Certified | Suspension Date | Suspension Expiration | Application Number | Trading As Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Distributor | Active |
Utility Insurance Information
No insurance information for this utility.
EGS Territories Serviced by a Utility
Residential
No
Citizens’ Electric
No
Small Commercial
Duquesne Light
No
Mixed Meter
Met-Ed
No
Large Commercial
No
PECO
No
Industrial
No
Penelec
No
Governmental
No
Penn Power
No
Pike
No
PPL
No
UGI Utilities - Electric
No
Wellsboro
No
West Penn Power
No
Docketed Cases
| Docket Number | Case Status | Date Filed | Allegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-2011-2270181 | Closed | 10/18/2011 | Complaintant states that they switched electric bill to their name in July 2011. Complaintant states that they owe a large amount on their bill. Complaintant states that PECO wants a large amount of money up front, but the complaintant states they still cannot afford the amount PECO wants up front. Complaintant would like to pay current bill each month plus a additional $50 to the balance is paid. Complaintant states that currently this is all they can afford. |
| F-2011-2270945 | Closed | 10/20/2011 | Complaintant states that in August 2009, a call was place to PECO to change the electric bill to James Dandridge, who was a friend of complaintant' s daughter. Complaintant states that in August 2011, Mr. Dandridge moved out and she found out the bill was in his name. Complaintan tstates that on August 19th, 2011 she called PECO to have the bill in her name. Complaintant found out after her application to change service in her name was denied, due to an outstanding balance by Mr. Dandridge. Complaintant states that PECO told her that she was responsible for the balance since she benefited from the service. Complaintant states that she investigated and found out all the bills from 2009 until present had been paid. COmplaintan tstates they called PUC, and was told to pay all bils, which complaintant did.Complaintant states that the PUC representative informed her that Mr. Dandridge had a outstanding balnce at a previous address and when he moved the balance became her responsibility. Complaintant wants the PECO bill in her name and not t obe held responsible for someone else's balance. |
| F-2011-2270924 | Closed | 10/20/2011 | Complaintant states that her complaints starts in 2008, when she paid one bill electronicaly, and PECO stated she was enrolled in on-line billing.Complaintant states that she called to be taken off on-line billing. Complaintant states that she requested a high bill from PECO and said the bill was correct without checking the meter. Complaintant states that she should not be paying $300 a month for electric, when she does not have electric heat. Complaintant tates since she did not receive a paer bill, she paid the amount she could afford.Complaintant states that she paid $2500 in December and $800 in June and August. Complaintant states that PECO denies that she made a $1048 payment. Complaintant states that she was told since she used a credit card that the payment was unacceptable. Complaintant also says PECO denied complaintant being able to set up a $539 a month automated deduction. Complaintant wants a payment term that is automatically deducted from complaintant's checking account or Complaintant would like to be able to pa with her credit card. |
| R-2011-2268711 | Closed | 10/20/2011 | |
| C-2011-2270093 | Closed | 10/21/2011 | Complaintant states that they had service shut off as an error. Complaintant states that the company had no record of complaintant calling and telling them that they would pay on Friday. Complaintant states that this happened in June. Complaintant states that a manager said that it would cost $525 for return of their service. Complaintant states that they were told after paying that service would return in 2-3 days. Complaintant states the managertold them that if their 81 year old mother had no health issues that return service was not a priority. Complaintant would like the supervisor reprimanded for unprofessional conduct, their deposit accredited back to their account, and for someone to look at their account, complaintant states that they do not owe thousands of dollars. |
| F-2011-2270781 | Closed | 10/21/2011 | Complainant states that she was charged with a tamper fee of $350 that they never had done. She would like the PUC to remove the charge. |
| F-2011-2270675 | Closed | 10/21/2011 | Complainant states that PECO is not useing the correct methoed per PA CODE to calculate the end of year reimbursement for customer-generators with unused hilowatt-hrs. |
| F-2011-2272107 | Closed | 10/21/2011 | Complainant states that she would like a payment agreement. |
| C-2011-2270984 | Closed | 10/24/2011 | Complainant states that she would like a payment agreement. |
| C-2011-2270986 | Closed | 10/24/2011 | Complainant states that he would like a payment agreement. |
| C-2011-2271997 | Closed | 10/27/2011 | Complainant states that she would like a payment agreement for her bill. |
| C-2011-2272000 | Closed | 10/27/2011 | Complainant states that he never received a bill in the mail nor did PECO give him a shut of notice and they just shut off service. |
| F-2011-2271991 | Closed | 10/27/2011 | Complainant states that she would like a lower payment agreement because she will use less electric now that summer is over. |
| F-2011-2271965 | Closed | 10/28/2011 | Complainant states that he would like a payment agreement and that he received a bill with an escrow amt and complainant states that he already paid that. |
| F-2011-2272099 | Closed | 10/28/2011 | Complainant states that there are incorrect charges on her bill. |
| C-2011-2272096 | Closed | 10/28/2011 | Complainant states that the units that are being build over $8,000 and these unit need slit into each unit instead of a whole. |
| F-2011-2271973 | Closed | 10/28/2011 | Complainant states that he would like a payment agreement and also that also had a termination notice. |
| C-2011-2272176 | Closed | 10/31/2011 | Complaintant states that they do not make the income to afford how high they owe on their bill. Complaintant states that ever since PECO placed a meter read, their bill has been getting higher. Complaintant would like lower bills to pay. |
| F-2011-2272191 | Closed | 11/1/2011 | Complaintant states that their electric was shut off without proper notice. Complaintant states since she has had service turned back on their monthly bill, charge amount, credit amount, total bill and balance forward do not add up. Complaintant states they have a re-connect fee, but they never had their service cut off. Complaintant states a nurse called PECO, who was taking care of a relative staying with complaintant and was told a shut off notice would have to be relevent. Complaintant states that three weeks after this call they were told to pa $500 deposit and their monthly bill.Complaintant wants the bill reviewed from September 1, 2010 to July 1, 2011, and for the $500 deposit to be dismissed. Complaintant would liek any credit accued to be put on thei rPECO account. |
| F-2011-2272299 | Closed | 11/1/2011 | Complaintant states that a bill came in the mail for $56.83, with a balance of the bill being $121.25. Complaintant states that this is before the credit of $64.42 was added from a Liheap grant.Complaintant states she is suppose to be on the Cap Rate Program, but recieved a bill to pay $36.00 to begin budget biling. Complaintant states that if she was already on budgetbilling her bill would not have been $121.25 and her credit would coverthe bill for August that she did not receive until September. Complaintant states that she is disputing her August bill. Complaintant wants it credited, since it was PECO's mistake. |
| F-2011-2272313 | Closed | 11/2/2011 | Complainant states that peco is trying to charge him for a service for a property that he sold in 8.1.10. Account Number: 95822-00047 |
| F-2011-2272373 | Closed | 11/2/2011 | Complainant states that PECO wants him to pay the bill for the residents of the 2nd floor. |
| C-2011-2272374 | Closed | 11/2/2011 | Complainant states that he would like the bill in his name (because it never was) and he would not like to pay for what the bill was when it wasnt in his name. |
| F-2011-2272318 | Closed | 11/2/2011 | Complainant states that PECO is charging him for service for a property that he sold in 8.1.10 Account Number: 98639-48010 |
| C-2011-2272370 | Closed | 11/3/2011 | Complaintant states that they want a payment arrangement. Complaintant wants the issue resolved by going to court, so PECO can arrange a affordable payment arrangement. |
Showing results 9276 - 9300 of 13407
Need More Help?
If you can't find what you're looking for here, please contact the PA Public Utility Commission. Call us at 1-800-692-7380 or contact us online.
Document Search
Public utility documents available electronically include case dockets, public meeting orders and more.
Filing & Resources
Find utility-related reports, laws and regulations, federal filings, tariffs, procedures and more.
eFILING
Consumers, utilities and attorneys can save time by submitting documents to the PUC electronically.
