Utility Code 110550
The Utility Detail View displays the Utility Information (identified by Utility Code - 110550), authorities, and case information associated with that utility.
Basic Utility Information
Utility Name
PECO ENERGY COMPANY-ELECTRIC
Utility Code
110550
Utility Type
Electric
Utility Status
Active
Carrier ID
Utility Contact Information
Physical Address
Mailing Address
2301 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA PA 19101
Phone
Fax
Website
www.exeloncorp.com/
Utility Authorities Information
| Service Type | Authority Status | Date Certified | Suspension Date | Suspension Expiration | Application Number | Trading As Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Distributor | Active |
Utility Insurance Information
No insurance information for this utility.
EGS Territories Serviced by a Utility
Residential
No
Citizens’ Electric
No
Small Commercial
Duquesne Light
No
Mixed Meter
Met-Ed
No
Large Commercial
No
PECO
No
Industrial
No
Penelec
No
Governmental
No
Penn Power
No
Pike
No
PPL
No
UGI Utilities - Electric
No
Wellsboro
No
West Penn Power
No
Docketed Cases
| Docket Number | Case Status | Date Filed | Allegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| F-2011-2273332 | Closed | 11/14/2011 | Complaintant states that they have had high electric bills, even after cutting down on the amount of electricity they use. Complaintant wants to know what is wrong with the bills. Complaintant would also like a reasonable payment arrangement, |
| C-2011-2270093 | Closed | 10/21/2011 | Complaintant states that they had service shut off as an error. Complaintant states that the company had no record of complaintant calling and telling them that they would pay on Friday. Complaintant states that this happened in June. Complaintant states that a manager said that it would cost $525 for return of their service. Complaintant states that they were told after paying that service would return in 2-3 days. Complaintant states the managertold them that if their 81 year old mother had no health issues that return service was not a priority. Complaintant would like the supervisor reprimanded for unprofessional conduct, their deposit accredited back to their account, and for someone to look at their account, complaintant states that they do not owe thousands of dollars. |
| F-2011-2279510 | Closed | 12/12/2011 | Complaintant states that they had a payment agreement with PECO, but they cancelled the agreement making the amount due immediately. Complaintant receive a bill for $888.86. Complaintant would like an explanation for the charges including waiving the late charges payment program. |
| C-2011-2266968 | Closed | 10/3/2011 | Complaintant states that they feel discrimianted against for going total electric. Complaintant states that they are having their rate adjustment taken from them by the PUC. Complaintant wants the PUC to reverse their mandate that PECO stops using the RH rate, because complaintant would like to be able to compare other companies rates. |
| C-2011-2280374 | Closed | 12/21/2011 | Complaintant states that they do not owe $578.26. Complaintant states that they went from a bill of $111.81 to a bill of $578.26, and no representatives have been able to say why the increase was made to the bill. Complaintant states tha twhen they talked to Harry Smith that the bill should only be $200 plus extra amount. Complaintant states that they have been current with their bill for 20 years, and previously have gone off the budget without the problems occuring now. Complaintan tis worried if they do not get this straightened out, that their bill could end up becoming more of a problem. Complaintant also wants to know if they got double billed by North American and PECO |
| C-2011-2272176 | Closed | 10/31/2011 | Complaintant states that they do not make the income to afford how high they owe on their bill. Complaintant states that ever since PECO placed a meter read, their bill has been getting higher. Complaintant would like lower bills to pay. |
| F-2011-2261537 | Closed | 9/6/2011 | Complaintant states that they created a account with PECO under her name in 2006. Complaintant states that her electric account was not mentioned in the PUC investigation report. Complaintant converted her property into two apartments with seperate electricity accounts. Complaintant states that electricity on the one account was shut off, and she asked her tenants to call PECO for electricity in their name. Complaintant states that the meters were mixed up at PECO's office. Complaintant states that they did not make the mistake and should not have to pay for it. |
| F-2011-2279295 | Closed | 12/7/2011 | Complaintant states that they cannot afford to pay high bill. Complaintant would like the PECO bill to be lowered and to be put on a reasonable payment plan. |
| F-2011-2267839 | Closed | 10/17/2011 | Complaintant states that they cancelled electric service and was sent a bill of $896.87 on their next bill due to budget billing balance. Complaintant states that the bill was doublw what she owed. Complaintant states that when researching PECO's website, she found out she only owes $305.56. Complaintant states that she has never paid a budget billing amount. Complaintan twants the budget balnce discrepency resolved by looking at the evidence provided in the complaint. Complaintant also wants budget billing removed fro mher residence. |
| C-2011-2267082 | Closed | 10/3/2011 | Complaintant states that they can not afford the down payment on the agreement. Complaintant states that they want PECO to give a reasonable amount down payment for the agreement, since they ar eon a fixed income. Complaintan tstates tha tthe bill is from a apartment building they use to own in 2003, and that they need help paying the bill. |
| C-2011-2260409 | Closed | 8/29/2011 | Complaintant states that they are being told to pay for a bill in Gloria McNear's name. Complaintant wants the bill to be sent to the correct person Gloria McNear not sent to him. Complaintant wants the service to be in his name wit hthe bill being made in his name. |
| F-2011-2273271 | Closed | 11/12/2011 | Complaintant states that there are incorrect chrges on her bill, there is a reliability and safety problem with their service, and the y received a shut off notice. Complaintant would like all the agents or representatives to share cost or pay cost.Complaintnat states that they should not have to pay for electric they did not order themself. Complaintant states that they should only have to share bill with their dad. |
| F-2012-2325791 | Closed | 9/17/2012 | Complaintant states that there are incorrect charges on his bill. |
| C-2011-2260112 | Closed | 8/29/2011 | Complaintant states that there are incorrect charges on her bill; but would like a payment agreement for the charges she is responsable for. |
| C-2011-2265871 | Closed | 9/23/2011 | Complaintant states that there are incorrect charges on complainants bill. |
| F-2011-2272191 | Closed | 11/1/2011 | Complaintant states that their electric was shut off without proper notice. Complaintant states since she has had service turned back on their monthly bill, charge amount, credit amount, total bill and balance forward do not add up. Complaintant states they have a re-connect fee, but they never had their service cut off. Complaintant states a nurse called PECO, who was taking care of a relative staying with complaintant and was told a shut off notice would have to be relevent. Complaintant states that three weeks after this call they were told to pa $500 deposit and their monthly bill.Complaintant wants the bill reviewed from September 1, 2010 to July 1, 2011, and for the $500 deposit to be dismissed. Complaintant would liek any credit accued to be put on thei rPECO account. |
| C-2011-2268186 | Closed | 10/14/2011 | Complaintant states that she has payment arrangements, but her income is below poverty level. Complaintant states that the payment plans is to much money.Complaintant needs a payment plan they can afford. |
| C-2011-2258632 | Closed | 8/19/2011 | Complaintant states that PECO technician indicated foreign wiring was suspected, as the house is a duplex. Later, another inspecton was requested after no foreign wiring was found. The inspector that came found no foreign wiring. Complaintant states that her name was then taken off the account and she did not owe anything. Complaintant states she then got a letter from a collecton department. Complaintant called PECO and found out the report sasid foreign wiring corrected, which meant she was responsible for al charges. Complaintant wants to know why the report was not corrected, and wants refunded for the amount she paid PECO. |
| C-2011-2265608 | Closed | 9/21/2011 | Complaintant states that PECO shut off the power for non-payment. Complaintant states hat due to emergency circumstances a contractor restored service, and they gave PECO $400 of a $700 bill and PECO once again shut off the power. Complaintant states that PECO said that complaintant had no right having someone turning back on the power, but complaintant needed the power for a guest wit ha breathing machine. Complaintant states that the box connected is connected to his house and is his property and the meter is connected to the box. Complaintant states that PECO trespassed on his property to turn off the power.Complaintant states that if PECO wants to shut off power that they can do it from the pole. Complaintnat states that PECOis charging a $925.00 tampering fee and the total bill is $1300 for service t obe restored. Complaintant wants to be treated fairly with shut off notice in advance and to have the tampering fee removed. |
| C-2011-2266511 | Closed | 9/30/2011 | Complaintant states that PECO has broken a agreement by selecting all electric for home owners. Complaintantstates that the basis for agreement was that PECO would share the benefit of higher electric volume for the same capital investment as other homes using other types of heating. Complaintant wants to continue residential heating rates. |
| C-2011-2268126 | Closed | 10/13/2011 | Complaintant states that PECO applied a contract minimum of 560 KW to all of complaintant's bill during non-summer months since June 2008.Complaintnat states that PECO should have applied limits of 200/500 KW with an off-peak maximum of 600 KW. Complaintnat states that PECO's mistake has cost a total of $145,683.55.Complaintant states that PECO placed them on rate GS, instead of a more suitable rate structure. Complaintnat would like refunded for the overcharges or credit between the rates and charges which were imposed under rate GS. Complaintnat would also like pre-judgement cost and other relief that the commission deems appropriate. |
| C-2011-2272850 | Closed | 11/7/2011 | Complaintant states that on August 21, 2011 an electrical surge or disruption occured. Complaintant states the elecric flickered and came back on between 3pm- 3:20pm. Complaintant states that when the electricity came back on the television had blown up, the refridgerator was almost lost as well as a cold/hot water dispenser. Complaintant had found out a wire came down on Audubon Road. Complaintant states that a representative told them that a pole was hit, but no repair work was require to fix the pole. Complaintant states that the stress from the wires being stretched caused the wire to snap and this caused the flickering that destroyed thier appliances. Complaintant states that if PECO would have fixed the problem immediately this would not have occured. Complaintant wants PECO to do the right thingand fix the problem. |
| F-2011-2270945 | Closed | 10/20/2011 | Complaintant states that in August 2009, a call was place to PECO to change the electric bill to James Dandridge, who was a friend of complaintant' s daughter. Complaintant states that in August 2011, Mr. Dandridge moved out and she found out the bill was in his name. Complaintan tstates that on August 19th, 2011 she called PECO to have the bill in her name. Complaintant found out after her application to change service in her name was denied, due to an outstanding balance by Mr. Dandridge. Complaintant states that PECO told her that she was responsible for the balance since she benefited from the service. Complaintant states that she investigated and found out all the bills from 2009 until present had been paid. COmplaintan tstates they called PUC, and was told to pay all bils, which complaintant did.Complaintant states that the PUC representative informed her that Mr. Dandridge had a outstanding balnce at a previous address and when he moved the balance became her responsibility. Complaintant wants the PECO bill in her name and not t obe held responsible for someone else's balance. |
| C-20027899 | Closed | 5/31/2002 | COMPLAINTANT STATES THAT HIS BUDGET PLAN IS TOO HIGH FOR HIS SALARY AND HE NEEDS TO WORK OUT A LOWER ONE. |
| F-2011-2270924 | Closed | 10/20/2011 | Complaintant states that her complaints starts in 2008, when she paid one bill electronicaly, and PECO stated she was enrolled in on-line billing.Complaintant states that she called to be taken off on-line billing. Complaintant states that she requested a high bill from PECO and said the bill was correct without checking the meter. Complaintant states that she should not be paying $300 a month for electric, when she does not have electric heat. Complaintant tates since she did not receive a paer bill, she paid the amount she could afford.Complaintant states that she paid $2500 in December and $800 in June and August. Complaintant states that PECO denies that she made a $1048 payment. Complaintant states that she was told since she used a credit card that the payment was unacceptable. Complaintant also says PECO denied complaintant being able to set up a $539 a month automated deduction. Complaintant wants a payment term that is automatically deducted from complaintant's checking account or Complaintant would like to be able to pa with her credit card. |
Showing results 2926 - 2950 of 13285
Need More Help?
If you can't find what you're looking for here, please contact the PA Public Utility Commission. Call us at 1-800-692-7380 or contact us online.
Document Search
Public utility documents available electronically include case dockets, public meeting orders and more.
Filing & Resources
Find utility-related reports, laws and regulations, federal filings, tariffs, procedures and more.
eFILING
Consumers, utilities and attorneys can save time by submitting documents to the PUC electronically.
