Utility Code 110550
The Utility Detail View displays the Utility Information (identified by Utility Code - 110550), authorities, and case information associated with that utility.
Basic Utility Information
Utility Name
PECO ENERGY COMPANY-ELECTRIC
Utility Code
110550
Utility Type
Electric
Utility Status
Active
Carrier ID
Utility Contact Information
Physical Address
Mailing Address
2301 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA PA 19101
Phone
Fax
Website
www.exeloncorp.com/
Utility Authorities Information
| Service Type | Authority Status | Date Certified | Suspension Date | Suspension Expiration | Application Number | Trading As Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Distributor | Active |
Utility Insurance Information
No insurance information for this utility.
EGS Territories Serviced by a Utility
Residential
No
Citizens’ Electric
No
Small Commercial
Duquesne Light
No
Mixed Meter
Met-Ed
No
Large Commercial
No
PECO
No
Industrial
No
Penelec
No
Governmental
No
Penn Power
No
Pike
No
PPL
No
UGI Utilities - Electric
No
Wellsboro
No
West Penn Power
No
Docketed Cases
| Docket Number | Case Status | Date Filed | Allegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-2011-2274493 | Closed | 11/21/2011 | Complainant states that his electric was turned off due to tampering but he never touch the meter. |
| C-2011-2274475 | Closed | 11/16/2011 | Complainant states that he would like a payment agreement. |
| C-2011-2273015 | Closed | 11/10/2011 | Complaintant states that they want the bill in Milton or Theron Turner's name.Complaintant states that Mr. Turner's ID was stolen for a period of about 10 years. Complaintant states thatthe individual was using Mr Turner's ID when using electric and gas at a residence that Mr. Turner never lived at nor used the electric and gas service. Complaintant wants to get on the CAP Program, since they will be receiving help from LHeap for most of the bill.Complaintant wants the PUC to order that they can get on the CAP Program, so they can live with a reasonable bill. |
| C-2011-2272850 | Closed | 11/7/2011 | Complaintant states that on August 21, 2011 an electrical surge or disruption occured. Complaintant states the elecric flickered and came back on between 3pm- 3:20pm. Complaintant states that when the electricity came back on the television had blown up, the refridgerator was almost lost as well as a cold/hot water dispenser. Complaintant had found out a wire came down on Audubon Road. Complaintant states that a representative told them that a pole was hit, but no repair work was require to fix the pole. Complaintant states that the stress from the wires being stretched caused the wire to snap and this caused the flickering that destroyed thier appliances. Complaintant states that if PECO would have fixed the problem immediately this would not have occured. Complaintant wants PECO to do the right thingand fix the problem. |
| C-2011-2272374 | Closed | 11/2/2011 | Complainant states that he would like the bill in his name (because it never was) and he would not like to pay for what the bill was when it wasnt in his name. |
| C-2011-2272370 | Closed | 11/3/2011 | Complaintant states that they want a payment arrangement. Complaintant wants the issue resolved by going to court, so PECO can arrange a affordable payment arrangement. |
| C-2011-2272176 | Closed | 10/31/2011 | Complaintant states that they do not make the income to afford how high they owe on their bill. Complaintant states that ever since PECO placed a meter read, their bill has been getting higher. Complaintant would like lower bills to pay. |
| C-2011-2272096 | Closed | 10/28/2011 | Complainant states that the units that are being build over $8,000 and these unit need slit into each unit instead of a whole. |
| C-2011-2272000 | Closed | 10/27/2011 | Complainant states that he never received a bill in the mail nor did PECO give him a shut of notice and they just shut off service. |
| C-2011-2271997 | Closed | 10/27/2011 | Complainant states that she would like a payment agreement for her bill. |
| C-2011-2270986 | Closed | 10/24/2011 | Complainant states that he would like a payment agreement. |
| C-2011-2270984 | Closed | 10/24/2011 | Complainant states that she would like a payment agreement. |
| C-2011-2270181 | Closed | 10/18/2011 | Complaintant states that they switched electric bill to their name in July 2011. Complaintant states that they owe a large amount on their bill. Complaintant states that PECO wants a large amount of money up front, but the complaintant states they still cannot afford the amount PECO wants up front. Complaintant would like to pay current bill each month plus a additional $50 to the balance is paid. Complaintant states that currently this is all they can afford. |
| C-2011-2270093 | Closed | 10/21/2011 | Complaintant states that they had service shut off as an error. Complaintant states that the company had no record of complaintant calling and telling them that they would pay on Friday. Complaintant states that this happened in June. Complaintant states that a manager said that it would cost $525 for return of their service. Complaintant states that they were told after paying that service would return in 2-3 days. Complaintant states the managertold them that if their 81 year old mother had no health issues that return service was not a priority. Complaintant would like the supervisor reprimanded for unprofessional conduct, their deposit accredited back to their account, and for someone to look at their account, complaintant states that they do not owe thousands of dollars. |
| C-2011-2268988 | Closed | 10/17/2011 | Complainant states that he would like a payment agreement. |
| C-2011-2268978 | Closed | 10/17/2011 | Complainant states that PECO terminated her service for 5 days after payment of bill. |
| C-2011-2268186 | Closed | 10/14/2011 | Complaintant states that she has payment arrangements, but her income is below poverty level. Complaintant states that the payment plans is to much money.Complaintant needs a payment plan they can afford. |
| C-2011-2268126 | Closed | 10/13/2011 | Complaintant states that PECO applied a contract minimum of 560 KW to all of complaintant's bill during non-summer months since June 2008.Complaintnat states that PECO should have applied limits of 200/500 KW with an off-peak maximum of 600 KW. Complaintnat states that PECO's mistake has cost a total of $145,683.55.Complaintant states that PECO placed them on rate GS, instead of a more suitable rate structure. Complaintnat would like refunded for the overcharges or credit between the rates and charges which were imposed under rate GS. Complaintnat would also like pre-judgement cost and other relief that the commission deems appropriate. |
| C-2011-2267959 | Closed | 10/11/2011 | Complainant states that there his bill is way to high and would like a payment agreement due to having medical bills. |
| C-2011-2267397 | Closed | 10/4/2011 | Complaintant states that because of power outages, full shifts have been lost. Complaintant states that there has been numerous other days with electric interruptions lasting hours causing work to stop. Complaintant states that PECO had a above ground cable runnin gfrom one manhole to another manhole continuosly getting runned over by trucks. Complaintant states that PECO promised to put the cable back undergound and failed to ge tit done. Complaintant states cable was finally put underground on September 26, but said other cables needed replaced as well. Complaintant states the job is still incomplete. Complaintant states that figurin gout total cost of outages and disruptions is hard, but Peco should realize the importance of the problem and if not be prepared for legal action. |
| C-2011-2267111 | Closed | 10/3/2011 | Complaintant states that they have received a termination notice, and would like a paymnet agreement plan.Complaintant want to have a payment arrangement, as they are disabled and their income has changed. |
| C-2011-2267082 | Closed | 10/3/2011 | Complaintant states that they can not afford the down payment on the agreement. Complaintant states that they want PECO to give a reasonable amount down payment for the agreement, since they ar eon a fixed income. Complaintan tstates tha tthe bill is from a apartment building they use to own in 2003, and that they need help paying the bill. |
| C-2011-2266968 | Closed | 10/3/2011 | Complaintant states that they feel discrimianted against for going total electric. Complaintant states that they are having their rate adjustment taken from them by the PUC. Complaintant wants the PUC to reverse their mandate that PECO stops using the RH rate, because complaintant would like to be able to compare other companies rates. |
| C-2011-2266511 | Closed | 9/30/2011 | Complaintant states that PECO has broken a agreement by selecting all electric for home owners. Complaintantstates that the basis for agreement was that PECO would share the benefit of higher electric volume for the same capital investment as other homes using other types of heating. Complaintant wants to continue residential heating rates. |
| C-2011-2266020 | Closed | 9/26/2011 | Complainant states that PECO wants an additional deposit of $405, when she has always paid her bill and her account is up to date. |
Showing results 8251 - 8275 of 13285
Need More Help?
If you can't find what you're looking for here, please contact the PA Public Utility Commission. Call us at 1-800-692-7380 or contact us online.
Document Search
Public utility documents available electronically include case dockets, public meeting orders and more.
Filing & Resources
Find utility-related reports, laws and regulations, federal filings, tariffs, procedures and more.
eFILING
Consumers, utilities and attorneys can save time by submitting documents to the PUC electronically.
