Utility Code 110550
The Utility Detail View displays the Utility Information (identified by Utility Code - 110550), authorities, and case information associated with that utility.
Basic Utility Information
Utility Name
PECO ENERGY COMPANY-ELECTRIC
Utility Code
110550
Utility Type
Electric
Utility Status
Active
Carrier ID
Utility Contact Information
Physical Address
Mailing Address
2301 MARKET STREET
PHILADELPHIA PA 19101
Phone
Fax
Website
www.exeloncorp.com/
Utility Authorities Information
| Service Type | Authority Status | Date Certified | Suspension Date | Suspension Expiration | Application Number | Trading As Name |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electric Distributor | Active |
Utility Insurance Information
No insurance information for this utility.
EGS Territories Serviced by a Utility
Residential
No
Citizens’ Electric
No
Small Commercial
Duquesne Light
No
Mixed Meter
Met-Ed
No
Large Commercial
No
PECO
No
Industrial
No
Penelec
No
Governmental
No
Penn Power
No
Pike
No
PPL
No
UGI Utilities - Electric
No
Wellsboro
No
West Penn Power
No
Docketed Cases
| Docket Number | Case Status | Date Filed | Allegation |
|---|---|---|---|
| C-2011-2272000 | Closed | 10/27/2011 | Complainant states that he never received a bill in the mail nor did PECO give him a shut of notice and they just shut off service. |
| F-2011-2271991 | Closed | 10/27/2011 | Complainant states that she would like a lower payment agreement because she will use less electric now that summer is over. |
| C-2011-2270986 | Closed | 10/24/2011 | Complainant states that he would like a payment agreement. |
| C-2011-2270984 | Closed | 10/24/2011 | Complainant states that she would like a payment agreement. |
| F-2011-2272107 | Closed | 10/21/2011 | Complainant states that she would like a payment agreement. |
| C-2011-2270093 | Closed | 10/21/2011 | Complaintant states that they had service shut off as an error. Complaintant states that the company had no record of complaintant calling and telling them that they would pay on Friday. Complaintant states that this happened in June. Complaintant states that a manager said that it would cost $525 for return of their service. Complaintant states that they were told after paying that service would return in 2-3 days. Complaintant states the managertold them that if their 81 year old mother had no health issues that return service was not a priority. Complaintant would like the supervisor reprimanded for unprofessional conduct, their deposit accredited back to their account, and for someone to look at their account, complaintant states that they do not owe thousands of dollars. |
| F-2011-2270781 | Closed | 10/21/2011 | Complainant states that she was charged with a tamper fee of $350 that they never had done. She would like the PUC to remove the charge. |
| F-2011-2270675 | Closed | 10/21/2011 | Complainant states that PECO is not useing the correct methoed per PA CODE to calculate the end of year reimbursement for customer-generators with unused hilowatt-hrs. |
| F-2011-2270924 | Closed | 10/20/2011 | Complaintant states that her complaints starts in 2008, when she paid one bill electronicaly, and PECO stated she was enrolled in on-line billing.Complaintant states that she called to be taken off on-line billing. Complaintant states that she requested a high bill from PECO and said the bill was correct without checking the meter. Complaintant states that she should not be paying $300 a month for electric, when she does not have electric heat. Complaintant tates since she did not receive a paer bill, she paid the amount she could afford.Complaintant states that she paid $2500 in December and $800 in June and August. Complaintant states that PECO denies that she made a $1048 payment. Complaintant states that she was told since she used a credit card that the payment was unacceptable. Complaintant also says PECO denied complaintant being able to set up a $539 a month automated deduction. Complaintant wants a payment term that is automatically deducted from complaintant's checking account or Complaintant would like to be able to pa with her credit card. |
| R-2011-2268711 | Closed | 10/20/2011 | |
| F-2011-2270945 | Closed | 10/20/2011 | Complaintant states that in August 2009, a call was place to PECO to change the electric bill to James Dandridge, who was a friend of complaintant' s daughter. Complaintant states that in August 2011, Mr. Dandridge moved out and she found out the bill was in his name. Complaintan tstates that on August 19th, 2011 she called PECO to have the bill in her name. Complaintant found out after her application to change service in her name was denied, due to an outstanding balance by Mr. Dandridge. Complaintant states that PECO told her that she was responsible for the balance since she benefited from the service. Complaintant states that she investigated and found out all the bills from 2009 until present had been paid. COmplaintan tstates they called PUC, and was told to pay all bils, which complaintant did.Complaintant states that the PUC representative informed her that Mr. Dandridge had a outstanding balnce at a previous address and when he moved the balance became her responsibility. Complaintant wants the PECO bill in her name and not t obe held responsible for someone else's balance. |
| C-2011-2270181 | Closed | 10/18/2011 | Complaintant states that they switched electric bill to their name in July 2011. Complaintant states that they owe a large amount on their bill. Complaintant states that PECO wants a large amount of money up front, but the complaintant states they still cannot afford the amount PECO wants up front. Complaintant would like to pay current bill each month plus a additional $50 to the balance is paid. Complaintant states that currently this is all they can afford. |
| C-2011-2268988 | Closed | 10/17/2011 | Complainant states that he would like a payment agreement. |
| F-2011-2267839 | Closed | 10/17/2011 | Complaintant states that they cancelled electric service and was sent a bill of $896.87 on their next bill due to budget billing balance. Complaintant states that the bill was doublw what she owed. Complaintant states that when researching PECO's website, she found out she only owes $305.56. Complaintant states that she has never paid a budget billing amount. Complaintan twants the budget balnce discrepency resolved by looking at the evidence provided in the complaint. Complaintant also wants budget billing removed fro mher residence. |
| C-2011-2268978 | Closed | 10/17/2011 | Complainant states that PECO terminated her service for 5 days after payment of bill. |
| F-2011-2268171 | Closed | 10/14/2011 | Complaintant states that he wants the bill to be placed in his name. Complaintant states that while he was in jail he did not see or pay any bills. Complaintant states that company gave false information about changing the bill in his name and making payment arrangement. Complaintant states tha this ex-wife handled all the bills. Complaintant did not know how much was owed and would like a payment arrangement that is affordable to pay back the amount owed. |
| C-2011-2268186 | Closed | 10/14/2011 | Complaintant states that she has payment arrangements, but her income is below poverty level. Complaintant states that the payment plans is to much money.Complaintant needs a payment plan they can afford. |
| M-2011-2267888 | Closed | 10/14/2011 | |
| F-2011-2268120 | Closed | 10/13/2011 | Complaintant states that he ending up falling behind on his bill due to a broken arm. Complaintant called PECO for a payment arrangement and was told he needed to pay $1000, which he could no tafford in one large payment. Complaintnat states that PECO keeps adding charges to make the past due amount higher. Complaintant states that PECO said he broke a agreement wit hthe PUC, but complaintant says that when he called the PUC there was no agreement.Complaintant states that he is trying to pa off bill, but needs help with a payment plan that is affordable. |
| C-2011-2268126 | Closed | 10/13/2011 | Complaintant states that PECO applied a contract minimum of 560 KW to all of complaintant's bill during non-summer months since June 2008.Complaintnat states that PECO should have applied limits of 200/500 KW with an off-peak maximum of 600 KW. Complaintnat states that PECO's mistake has cost a total of $145,683.55.Complaintant states that PECO placed them on rate GS, instead of a more suitable rate structure. Complaintnat would like refunded for the overcharges or credit between the rates and charges which were imposed under rate GS. Complaintnat would also like pre-judgement cost and other relief that the commission deems appropriate. |
| F-2011-2268117 | Closed | 10/13/2011 | Complaintan tstates that they want account in their name for 7262 Glen Thorne Road APTC Upper Darby 19082. Complaintant states that they want payment arrangement for back bill at different address. Complaintant states that they is $6.80 month = $340. Complaintant's rent is $580 month. |
| C-2011-2267959 | Closed | 10/11/2011 | Complainant states that there his bill is way to high and would like a payment agreement due to having medical bills. |
| F-2011-2267957 | Closed | 10/11/2011 | Complaintant states they have been receiving high bills during hte time period of 1-12-2011 t o2-21-2011. Complaintan thad flooding in the basement so repair work took weeks to complete, and even with a credit adjustment is still being overcharged for unoccured usage.Complaintant states because of fire damage he temporarly borrowed electric from a neighbor until borrowing a generator. Complaintant states that electrician provided a temporary hook up, so complaintant coul duse tools necessary to fix house. Complaintant states after was completed in September 20110, he called the electrician to finish hooking up electricity and to call PECO for a meter to be installed. Compliantan tnever got a response from the electrician and used electric heaters causing a rise in usage. Complaintan thas installed cast iron radiators, which have helped lower the usage.Complaintant states that PECO should go after the electrician for not putting up stickers and contacting them to install a meter. |
| C-2011-2267397 | Closed | 10/4/2011 | Complaintant states that because of power outages, full shifts have been lost. Complaintant states that there has been numerous other days with electric interruptions lasting hours causing work to stop. Complaintant states that PECO had a above ground cable runnin gfrom one manhole to another manhole continuosly getting runned over by trucks. Complaintant states that PECO promised to put the cable back undergound and failed to ge tit done. Complaintant states cable was finally put underground on September 26, but said other cables needed replaced as well. Complaintant states the job is still incomplete. Complaintant states that figurin gout total cost of outages and disruptions is hard, but Peco should realize the importance of the problem and if not be prepared for legal action. |
| C-2011-2267111 | Closed | 10/3/2011 | Complaintant states that they have received a termination notice, and would like a paymnet agreement plan.Complaintant want to have a payment arrangement, as they are disabled and their income has changed. |
Showing results 4126 - 4150 of 13412
Need More Help?
If you can't find what you're looking for here, please contact the PA Public Utility Commission. Call us at 1-800-692-7380 or contact us online.
Document Search
Public utility documents available electronically include case dockets, public meeting orders and more.
Filing & Resources
Find utility-related reports, laws and regulations, federal filings, tariffs, procedures and more.
eFILING
Consumers, utilities and attorneys can save time by submitting documents to the PUC electronically.
